North Carolina State University
2001-2002 Graduating Senior Survey:
College Comparisons of
Academic Environment

This document reports survey data on college differences in the respondents' overall assessment of the academic environment at NC State. Survey results for all respondents are provided in "2001-2002 Graduating Senior Survey: All Respondents." For information about the survey and analysis methods, see "2001-2002 Graduating Senior Survey: Introduction, Methods, and Student Demographic Profile."

Satisfaction with Education | Quality of Instruction | Intellectual Environment | Faculty Contributions


Satisfaction with Education

Q Choose NC State again?

NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
 No  % 8.4 6.5 5.1 8.6 5.4 10.4 9.7 5.7 8.7
Not sure % 14.3 12.5 11.9 13.6 13.0 15.8 13.9 7.5 18.7
Yes % 77.3 81.0 83.1 77.8 81.5 73.8 76.4 86.8 72.6

Back to Top

Q Choose same major again?

NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
 No  % 15.9 21.4 10.3 9.6 22.8 19.6 15.3 25.0 14.2
Not sure % 20.5 21.4 24.1 17.7 32.6 21.5 16.7 25.0 19.1
Yes % 63.7 57.2 65.5 72.7 44.6 58.9 68.1 50.0 66.7

Back to Top

Q Recommend NCSU to a friend

NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
 No  % 3.8 2.3 8.6 4.3 1.1 4.7 4.2 . 3.6
Not sure % 8.2 5.8 1.7 9.4 7.6 9.7 12.5 11.3 5.6
Yes % 88.0 91.8 89.7 86.3 91.3 85.6 83.3 88.7 90.8

Back to Top


Quality of Instruction

Q Quality of instruction in major

NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.34 3.51 3.49 3.16 3.61 3.37 3.47 3.57 3.31
    1.6 1.1 . 3.7 . 0.5 1.4 1.9 0.4
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 7.7 5.4 3.4 12.1 3.3 7.4 2.8 1.9 5.6
3: Good % 45.3 34.4 44.1 49.2 32.6 46.8 43.1 34.0 56.2
4: Excellent % 45.4 59.1 52.5 35.0 64.1 45.3 52.8 62.3 37.8

Back to Top

Q Quality of instruction overall

NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 2.96 3.06 3.02 2.88 2.88 3.00 2.92 2.74 2.99
    1.2 1.2 1.7 1.9 2.2 0.2 1.4 3.8 .
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 17.3 14.2 11.9 20.7 21.7 15.6 15.5 22.6 15.5
3: Good % 65.9 62.1 69.5 64.4 62.0 67.6 73.2 69.8 69.8
4: Excellent % 15.5 22.5 16.9 13.0 14.1 16.5 9.9 3.8 14.7

Back to Top

Q Overall Education at NC State

NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.27 3.40 3.44 3.20 3.42 3.23 3.30 3.28 3.28
    0.6 1.1 . 0.5 . 0.2 1.4 1.9 0.4
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 8.3 4.0 3.4 12.6 6.7 9.1 2.8 5.7 6.3
3: Good % 54.2 49.0 49.2 53.8 44.4 58.0 60.6 54.7 58.3
4: Excellent % 36.9 45.9 47.5 33.1 48.9 32.7 35.2 37.7 34.9

Back to Top


Intellectual Environment

Q Intellectual environment on campus

NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.10 3.21 3.26 3.04 3.15 3.09 3.03 3.11 3.09
    0.5 0.6 . 0.8 . 0.2 . . 0.4
1: Very weak %
2: Weak % 9.7 4.1 3.4 13.1 8.8 10.1 12.5 7.5 10.2
3: Strong % 69.0 68.8 67.2 67.6 67.0 70.5 72.2 73.6 69.5
4: Very strong % 20.8 26.5 29.3 18.4 24.2 19.2 15.3 18.9 19.9

Back to Top


Q Faculty Contributions

Faculty: Set high expectations for learning NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.34 3.52 3.59 3.22 3.53 3.33 3.40 3.26 3.24
    0.5 0.3 . 0.9 . . . 3.7 .
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 5.0 1.7 1.7 7.5 2.2 5.6 4.2 5.6 4.4
3: Good % 54.9 43.5 37.3 59.6 42.4 56.0 51.4 51.9 67.5
4: Excellent % 39.6 54.5 61.0 31.9 55.4 38.4 44.4 38.9 28.2

 

Faculty: Respect diverse talents/ways of learning NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.04 3.19 3.41 2.81 3.23 3.19 2.94 3.00 3.05
    2.2 2.8 . 3.0 2.2 1.6 4.2 3.8 0.4
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 16.9 10.8 6.8 26.4 8.7 12.8 15.5 11.3 15.8
3: Good % 55.2 51.3 45.8 57.1 53.3 50.9 62.0 66.0 62.1
4: Excellent % 25.7 35.1 47.5 13.5 35.9 34.7 18.3 18.9 21.7

 

Faculty: Encourage actively involved learning NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.15 3.22 3.56 2.94 3.40 3.30 3.18 3.23 3.13
    1.8 1.7 . 3.3 . 1.1 . 3.8 0.4
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 14.5 13.6 1.7 20.9 9.8 9.0 12.7 11.3 14.7
3: Good % 50.4 45.2 40.7 54.5 40.2 48.8 56.3 43.4 56.3
4: Excellent % 33.3 39.5 57.6 21.3 50.0 41.1 31.0 41.5 28.6

 

Faculty: Encourage student-faculty interactions NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.06 3.28 3.47 2.81 3.43 3.15 3.14 3.43 2.92
    3.0 2.0 1.7 5.0 . 2.5 . 1.9 2.4
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 19.8 12.0 6.8 28.1 13.0 14.7 22.2 13.2 24.9
3: Good % 45.0 42.0 33.9 47.5 30.4 47.9 41.7 24.5 51.4
4: Excellent % 32.2 44.0 57.6 19.4 56.5 35.0 36.1 60.4 21.3

 

Faculty: Give frequent and prompt feedback NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.09 3.26 3.44 2.87 3.30 3.14 3.28 3.23 3.09
    1.6 1.4 . 3.5 . 0.7 . . 0.8
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 15.3 9.7 6.8 23.3 12.0 14.4 6.9 15.1 9.9
3: Good % 55.3 50.0 42.4 56.0 45.7 55.2 58.3 47.2 68.4
4: Excellent % 27.8 38.9 50.8 17.2 42.4 29.7 34.7 37.7 20.9

 

Faculty: Encourage devoting time/energy to coursework NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.27 3.45 3.59 3.16 3.38 3.26 3.28 3.26 3.22
    0.8 0.3 . 1.6 . 0.5 . 1.9 0.8
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 8.6 4.5 . 12.0 8.7 9.7 5.6 5.7 7.5
3: Good % 53.0 45.0 40.7 55.1 44.6 53.3 61.1 56.6 60.9
4: Excellent % 37.6 50.1 59.3 31.3 46.7 36.6 33.3 35.8 30.8

 

Faculty: Opportunities to learn cooperatively with others NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.22 3.25 3.64 3.09 3.65 3.17 3.10 3.46 3.30
    1.8 2.5 . 3.0 1.1 0.7 1.4 3.7 0.4
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 13.6 11.3 5.1 17.0 2.2 16.7 15.3 3.7 10.3
3: Good % 45.8 45.0 25.4 47.9 27.5 48.0 55.6 35.2 48.6
4: Excellent % 38.8 41.1 69.5 32.0 69.2 34.7 27.8 57.4 40.7

 

Faculty: Care about your academic success NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.04 3.22 3.57 2.75 3.48 3.17 3.10 3.34 2.96
    4.2 4.2 . 7.4 1.1 2.3 2.8 5.7 2.0
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 18.0 12.5 5.2 28.0 6.5 13.1 15.3 7.5 19.4
3: Good % 46.9 39.9 32.8 46.7 35.9 50.3 51.4 34.0 59.5
4: Excellent % 30.9 43.3 62.1 17.9 56.5 34.3 30.6 52.8 19.0

 

Faculty: Evaluation on all eight measures NCSU College
CALS CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.17 3.31 3.56 2.97 3.48 3.25 3.21 3.35 3.10
    1.2 1.4 . 2.1 . 0.5 . 3.7 0.4
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 9.5 6.3 1.7 15.3 6.5 6.5 6.9 5.6 8.7
3: Good % 60.6 52.3 40.7 66.5 39.1 60.9 65.3 42.6 71.8
4: Excellent % 28.8 40.1 57.6 16.1 54.3 32.1 27.8 48.1 19.0

Back to Top


For more information on the 2001-2002 Graduating Senior Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: September, 2002

Download a Microsoft Excel Version of this report.

Return to 2001-2002 Graduating Senior Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page