North Carolina State University
2001-2002 Graduating Senior Survey:
Gender and Racial/Ethnic Comparisons of
Services for Students

This document reports survey data on gender and racial/ethnic differences in the respondents' overall assessment of academic and non-academic services outside the classroom . Survey results for all respondents are provided in "2001-2002 Graduating Senior Survey: All Respondents." For information about the survey and analysis methods, see "2001-2002 Graduating Senior Survey: Introduction, Methods, and Student Demographic Profile."

Academic Services:
Academic Advising (In Major) | Research Support | Library Services | Technology Services | Career-related Services | Employment Services |

Non-Academic Services:
Service Areas | Staff Responsiveness

Financial Aid


Q Academic Advising (In Major)

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Advising: Access to advisor 3.22 3.23 3.22 3.24 3.22 3.22
Advising: Sufficient time with advisor 3.13 3.16 3.11 3.12 3.14 3.07
Advising: Accurate info. about degree req./courses 3.17 3.12 3.21 3.23 3.17 3.14
Advising: Knowledge of policies/procedures 3.13 3.10 3.16 3.20 3.13 3.13
Academic advising overall 3.15 3.14 3.16 3.20 3.15 3.14
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top


Q Research Support

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Research: Access to faculty involved in research 2.99 3.06 2.94 2.89 2.99 3.04
Research: Access to up-to-date facilities 2.96 3.07 2.87 3.12 2.94 2.95
Research support overall 3.00 3.09 2.94 3.01 3.00 2.99
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top


Q Technology Services

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Tech: Access to Internet 3.63 3.63 3.62 3.68 3.62 3.65
Tech: Hours of operation for computer labs 3.33 3.38 3.29 3.45 3.33 3.25
Tech: Access to up-to-date facilities 3.30 3.40 3.21 3.39 3.30 3.20
Tech: Access to trained staff for help 2.79 2.87 2.72 2.86 2.78 2.78
Tech: Training classes 2.88 2.94 2.83 3.01 2.86 2.93
Technology services overall 3.26 3.33 3.21 3.31 3.26 3.18
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top

Q Library Services

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Library: Hours of operation 3.70 3.73 3.67 3.76 3.69 3.70
Library: Staff responsiveness 3.39 3.35 3.42 3.38 3.38 3.46
Library: Access to databases/collections 3.45 3.44 3.45 3.51 3.43 3.53
Library: Training to use library 2.94 2.93 2.96 3.15 2.90 3.21
Library services overall 3.45 3.44 3.45 3.47 3.44 3.51
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top


Q Career-related Services

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Career: Oppor. for career assistance 3.18 3.22 3.15 3.25 3.18 3.15
Career: Info. on internships, co-op, etc. 3.13 3.15 3.10 3.25 3.12 3.10
Career: Resources available to explore options 3.12 3.15 3.09 3.20 3.11 3.13
Career: Info. through Internet and other technology 3.24 3.27 3.22 3.28 3.24 3.25
Career-related services overall 3.15 3.20 3.11 3.19 3.14 3.18
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top

Q Employment-related Services

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Employment: Resume preparation 3.13 3.18 3.08 3.29 3.10 3.20
Employment: interview prep skills 2.98 3.02 2.96 3.16 2.96 3.01
Employment: access to career fairs, job listings, etc. 3.19 3.24 3.16 3.28 3.18 3.26
Employment search assistance overall 3.07 3.13 3.03 3.15 3.06 3.13
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top

 


Q Non-Academic Services

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Service Area: Personal safety on campus 2.97 2.92 3.01 2.95 2.97 3.01
Service Area: Univ planning & placement svcs 2.80 2.82 2.80 2.85 2.79 2.92
Service Area: College/dept placement svcs 3.00 3.07 2.94 3.05 2.99 3.14
Service Area: Library services 3.31 3.29 3.33 3.42 3.29 3.43
Service Area: Bookstore services and products 2.92 3.01 2.85 3.01 2.92 2.91
Service Area: Registration process 3.21 3.19 3.22 3.16 3.22 3.18
Service Area: Financial aid svcs:application/award prcss 2.89 2.92 2.86 2.71 2.91 2.95
Service Area: Financial aid svcs:disbursement process 2.75 2.76 2.74 2.56 2.77 2.83
Service Area: Campus food services 2.45 2.44 2.46 2.48 2.45 2.41
Service Area: Campus health services 3.09 2.99 3.19 3.17 3.09 3.10
Service Area: Campus counseling (not career) svcs 3.06 3.03 3.07 3.12 3.05 3.02
Service Area: Business svcs/cashier/student accts 2.72 2.72 2.71 2.61 2.73 2.73
Service Area: Residence life programs 2.82 2.90 2.75 2.88 2.81 2.89
Service Area: Opportunities for rec activities 3.34 3.37 3.31 3.38 3.34 3.34
Service Area: Opportunities for community svc 3.13 3.19 3.07 3.25 3.11 3.23
Service Area: Opps to dev leadership skills 3.16 3.24 3.09 3.28 3.13 3.28
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top

Q Non-Academic Services: Staff Responsiveness:

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Staff Resp: Personal safety on campus 2.89 2.88 2.90 2.81 2.90 2.97
Staff Resp: Univ planning & placement svcs 2.88 2.91 2.86 3.04 2.86 2.90
Staff Resp: College/dept placement svcs 3.04 3.11 2.99 3.07 3.03 3.23
Staff Resp: Library services 3.27 3.23 3.31 3.39 3.26 3.36
Staff Resp: Bookstore services and products 2.93 2.96 2.91 2.99 2.92 2.96
Staff Resp: Registration process 3.09 3.08 3.10 3.02 3.10 3.08
Staff Resp: Financial aid svcs:application/award prcss 2.74 2.68 2.79 2.66 2.74 2.98
Staff Resp: Financial aid svcs:disbursement process 2.65 2.59 2.69 2.51 2.64 3.03
Staff Resp: Campus food services 2.59 2.59 2.59 2.62 2.60 2.35
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top


Financial Aid Services

Q Received Financial Aid

  All Women Men AfAm White Other
Yes (%) 61.2% 61.9% 60.7% 88.4% 58.6% 61.5%
No (%) 38.8% 38.1% 39.3% 11.6% 41.4% 38.5%

Q Satisfaction with Aid Package

  All Women Men AfAm White Other
4: Very satisfied (%) 43.4% 46.7% 40.6% 37.3% 43.9% 46.6%
3: Moderately satisfied (%) 47.6% 45.2% 49.5% 51.5% 47.5% 42.0%
2: Moderately dissatisfied (%) 6.5% 5.5% 7.4% 7.5% 6.3% 8.0%
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 2.5% 2.6% 2.5% 3.7% 2.3% 3.4%

 

Q Satisfaction with Financial Aid Staff

  All Women Men AfAm White Other
Financial aid reception staff 19.7% 18.5% 20.7% 13.6% 20.7% 20.0%
4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%) 49.2% 48.9% 49.4% 48.5% 48.8% 53.8%
2: Fair (%) 22.9% 25.8% 20.5% 29.5% 21.7% 23.8%
1: Poor (%) 8.3% 6.8% 9.5% 8.3% 8.9% 2.5%
 
  All Women Men AfAm White Other
Financial aid phone staff 16.1% 13.3% 18.5% 8.9% 17.2% 17.9%
4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%) 45.8% 47.0% 44.7% 47.6% 45.0% 50.7%
2: Fair (%) 26.3% 29.3% 23.7% 30.6% 25.7% 23.9%
1: Poor (%) 11.8% 10.3% 13.1% 12.9% 12.1% 7.5%
 
  All Women Men AfAm White Other
Financial aid advisor staff 24.5% 24.1% 24.8% 21.1% 24.6% 29.4%
4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%) 46.9% 46.3% 47.4% 47.2% 46.8% 47.1%
2: Fair (%) 20.1% 19.7% 20.3% 24.4% 19.5% 17.6%
1: Poor (%) 8.5% 9.9% 7.5% 7.3% 9.0% 5.9%

Back to Top


For more information on the 2001-2002 Graduating Senior Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: September, 2002

Download a Microsoft Excel Version of this report.

Return to 2001-2002 Graduating Senior Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page