North Carolina State University
2001-2002 Graduating Senior Survey:
Frequency Distributions
for Faculty Contributions

This document reports the frequency distribution by gender and race/ethnicity for survey items asking about the ways in which faculty contributed to the respondent's education. (Back to means)


Faculty Contributions

Q Set high expectations for learning

  All Women Men AfAm White Other
4: Excellent (%) 39.6% 44.8% 35.4% 40.6% 40.2% 31.0%
3: Good (%) 54.9% 50.7% 58.1% 49.7% 54.6% 63.4%
2: Fair (%) 5.1% 4.4% 5.6% 9.7% 4.8% 3.4%
1: Poor (%) 0.5% 0.1% 0.8% 0.0% 0.4% 2.1%
Back to Top

Q Respect diverse talents/ways of learning

  All Women Men AfAm White Other
4: Excellent (%) 25.8% 29.3% 23.0% 22.6% 26.2% 24.8%
3: Good (%) 55.0% 52.9% 56.6% 48.4% 55.5% 56.6%
2: Fair (%) 16.9% 15.3% 18.1% 23.9% 16.4% 14.5%
1: Poor (%) 2.3% 2.4% 2.3% 5.2% 1.9% 4.1%
Back to Top

Q Encourage actively involved learning

  All Women Men AfAm White Other
4: Excellent (%) 33.3% 36.2% 31.0% 29.7% 34.3% 25.5%
3: Good (%) 50.5% 50.1% 50.9% 49.7% 50.6% 51.0%
2: Fair (%) 14.4% 12.5% 15.8% 18.1% 13.5% 20.7%
1: Poor (%) 1.8% 1.3% 2.3% 2.6% 1.7% 2.8%
Back to Top

Q Encourage student-faculty interaction

  All Women Men AfAm White Other
4: Excellent (%) 32.3% 36.4% 29.0% 25.3% 33.4% 26.9%
3: Good (%) 44.9% 45.0% 44.8% 44.2% 44.6% 49.0%
2: Fair (%) 19.7% 15.7% 23.0% 24.0% 19.6% 16.6%
1: Poor (%) 3.0% 2.9% 3.2% 6.5% 2.3% 7.6%
Back to Top


Q Give frequent and prompt feedback

  All Women Men AfAm White Other
4: Excellent (%) 27.9% 31.2% 25.2% 30.3% 27.8% 26.2%
3: Good (%) 55.1% 55.0% 55.2% 51.6% 55.3% 56.6%
2: Fair (%) 15.4% 12.8% 17.4% 16.8% 15.4% 13.8%
1: Poor (%) 1.6% 0.9% 2.2% 1.3% 1.5% 3.4%
Back to Top

Q Encourage devoting time/energy to coursework

  All Women Men AfAm White Other
4: Excellent (%) 37.6% 41.7% 34.4% 34.8% 38.8% 26.9%
3: Good (%) 52.9% 50.6% 54.7% 56.8% 51.9% 60.7%
2: Fair (%) 8.7% 7.4% 9.6% 7.7% 8.5% 11.7%
1: Poor (%) 0.8% 0.2% 1.3% 0.6% 0.8% 0.7%
Back to Top

Q Opportunity to learn cooperatively with fellow students

  All Women Men AfAm White Other
4: Excellent (%) 38.8% 40.1% 37.8% 35.1% 39.5% 34.7%
3: Good (%) 45.6% 45.6% 45.7% 45.5% 45.5% 47.2%
2: Fair (%) 13.7% 12.6% 14.5% 17.5% 13.2% 15.3%
1: Poor (%) 1.9% 1.7% 2.0% 1.9% 1.8% 2.8%
Back to Top

Q Care about your academic success and welfare

  All Women Men AfAm White Other
4: Excellent (%) 30.9% 34.0% 28.5% 22.4% 32.1% 26.2%
3: Good (%) 46.9% 48.5% 45.6% 47.4% 46.9% 46.2%
2: Fair (%) 17.9% 14.6% 20.6% 21.7% 17.2% 22.1%
1: Poor (%) 4.3% 2.9% 5.4% 8.6% 3.8% 5.5%
Back to Top

Q Evaluation on all eight measures

  All Women Men AfAm White Other
4: Excellent (%) 28.8% 33.0% 25.5% 25.3% 29.6% 23.4%
3: Good (%) 60.5% 58.7% 62.0% 56.5% 60.7% 62.8%
2: Fair (%) 9.5% 7.9% 10.8% 16.9% 8.6% 12.4%
1: Poor (%) 1.2% 0.5% 1.7% 1.3% 1.1% 1.4%
Back to Top

Back to means


For more information on the 2001-2002 Graduating Senior Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: September, 2002

Download a Microsoft Excel Version of this report.

Return to 2001-2002 Graduating Senior Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page