North Carolina State University
2002-2003 Graduating Senior Survey:
Gender and Racial/Ethnic Comparisons of
Services for Students

This document reports survey data on gender and racial/ethnic differences in the respondents' overall assessment of academic and non-academic services outside the classroom . Survey results for all respondents are provided in "2002-2003 Graduating Senior Survey: All Respondents." For information about the survey and analysis methods, see "2002-2003 Graduating Senior Survey: Introduction, Methods, and Student Demographic Profile."

Academic Services:
Academic Advising (In Major) | Research Support | Library Services | Technology Services | Career-related Services | Employment Services |

Non-Academic Services:
Service Areas | Staff Responsiveness

Financial Aid


Q Academic Advising (In Major)

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Advising: Access to advisor 3.19 3.20 3.19 3.24 3.19 3.22
Advising: Sufficient time with advisor 3.07 3.13 3.03 3.06 3.07 3.08
Advising: Accurate info. about degree req./courses 3.11 3.11 3.12 3.06 3.12 3.10
Advising: Knowledge of policies/procedures 3.10 3.10 3.09 3.04 3.11 3.03
Academic advising overall 3.10 3.10 3.09 3.09 3.10 3.06
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top


Q Research Support

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Research: Access to faculty involved in research 3.01 3.13 2.92 3.01 3.02 2.91
Research: Access to up-to-date facilities 3.02 3.13 2.93 3.18 3.01 3.03
Research support overall 3.03 3.12 2.96 3.05 3.03 2.99
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top


Q Technology Services

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Tech: Access to Internet 3.68 3.70 3.67 3.65 3.69 3.67
Tech: Hours of operation for computer labs 3.35 3.41 3.31 3.44 3.35 3.32
Tech: Access to up-to-date facilities 3.37 3.49 3.28 3.46 3.38 3.28
Tech: Access to trained staff for help 2.88 2.98 2.79 3.06 2.86 2.91
Tech: Training classes 2.94 3.00 2.90 3.14 2.92 2.96
Technology services overall 3.30 3.36 3.25 3.34 3.30 3.26
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top

Q Library Services

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Library: Hours of operation 3.40 3.43 3.37 3.55 3.38 3.41
Library: Staff responsiveness 3.35 3.35 3.35 3.41 3.34 3.38
Library: Access to databases/collections 3.42 3.43 3.41 3.44 3.42 3.44
Library: Training to use library 2.94 2.99 2.89 3.18 2.90 3.02
Library services overall 3.36 3.38 3.34 3.41 3.35 3.36
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top


Q Career-related Services

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Career: Oppor. for career assistance 3.11 3.18 3.05 3.16 3.11 3.01
Career: Info. on internships, co-op, etc. 3.09 3.14 3.04 3.17 3.08 3.12
Career: Resources available to explore options 3.03 3.07 3.00 3.16 3.02 3.03
Career: Info. through Internet and other technology 3.19 3.24 3.15 3.29 3.18 3.13
Career-related services overall 3.09 3.16 3.04 3.22 3.08 3.07
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top

Q Employment-related Services

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Employment: Resume preparation 3.08 3.09 3.08 3.16 3.08 3.08
Employment: interview prep skills 2.91 2.93 2.90 3.10 2.89 2.93
Employment: access to career fairs, job listings, etc. 3.12 3.15 3.09 3.24 3.11 3.11
Employment search assistance overall 3.03 3.06 3.00 3.15 3.02 2.99
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top

 


Q Non-Academic Services

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Service Area: Personal safety on campus 2.92 2.90 2.94 2.93 2.91 2.98
Service Area: Univ planning & placement svcs 2.74 2.76 2.73 3.00 2.71 2.71
Service Area: College/dept placement svcs 2.97 3.00 2.94 3.07 2.95 3.00
Service Area: Library services 3.30 3.30 3.31 3.34 3.29 3.39
Service Area: Bookstore services and products 2.97 3.07 2.89 3.02 2.97 2.98
Service Area: Registration process 3.21 3.19 3.23 3.23 3.21 3.20
Service Area: Financial aid svcs:application/award prcss 2.97 2.96 2.98 2.77 2.98 3.08
Service Area: Financial aid svcs:disbursement process 2.98 2.97 2.98 2.92 2.97 3.12
Service Area: Campus food services 2.52 2.51 2.53 2.56 2.53 2.38
Service Area: Campus health services 3.06 3.02 3.10 3.19 3.04 3.08
Service Area: Campus counseling (not career) svcs 3.04 3.01 3.05 3.18 3.03 2.95
Service Area: Business svcs/cashier/student accts 2.83 2.85 2.81 2.81 2.83 2.82
Service Area: Residence life programs 2.80 2.90 2.72 2.85 2.81 2.71
Service Area: Opportunities for rec activities 3.26 3.29 3.24 3.22 3.28 3.12
Service Area: Opportunities for community svc 3.10 3.19 3.01 3.17 3.09 3.09
Service Area: Opps to dev leadership skills 3.13 3.18 3.08 3.17 3.13 3.06
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top

Q Non-Academic Services: Staff Responsiveness:

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good," 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Staff Resp: Personal safety on campus 2.93 2.94 2.92 2.92 2.93 2.96
Staff Resp: Univ planning & placement svcs 2.81 2.84 2.79 3.06 2.78 2.87
Staff Resp: College/dept placement svcs 3.01 3.08 2.96 3.05 3.00 3.06
Staff Resp: Library services 3.30 3.31 3.30 3.32 3.29 3.40
Staff Resp: Bookstore services and products 2.98 3.01 2.97 3.01 2.99 2.91
Staff Resp: Registration process 3.12 3.13 3.11 3.14 3.12 3.05
Staff Resp: Financial aid svcs:application/award prcss 2.84 2.84 2.85 2.71 2.85 2.94
Staff Resp: Financial aid svcs:disbursement process 2.86 2.85 2.87 2.74 2.87 2.88
Staff Resp: Campus food services 2.65 2.66 2.64 2.78 2.65 2.46
View Frequency Distributions
Back to Top


Financial Aid Services

Q Received Financial Aid

  All Women Men AfAm White Other
Receive financial aid while at NCSU? 62.2 62.1 62.3 88.4 59.7 63.4
Yes (%)
No (%) 37.8 37.9 37.7 11.6 40.3 36.6

Q Satisfaction with Aid Package

  All Women Men AfAm White Other
Satisfaction with fin aid package 44.3 46.1 42.8 36.7 45.2 44.9
4: Very satisfied (%)
3: Moderately satisfied (%) 46.4 44.9 47.7 49.4 45.8 48.8
2: Moderately dissatisfied (%) 7.5 7.4 7.6 11.4 7.2 4.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 1.8 1.7 1.9 2.4 1.7 1.6

 

Q Satisfaction with Financial Aid Staff

  All Women Men AfAm White Other
Rate financial aid reception staff 23.2 22.6 23.7 18.2 23.7 25.2
4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%) 48.4 47.8 48.9 45.9 48.2 52.9
2: Fair (%) 20.3 21.1 19.6 27.7 19.6 16.8
1: Poor (%) 8.1 8.6 7.7 8.2 8.5 5.0
  All Women Men AfAm White Other
Rate financial aid phone staff 20.9 21.0 20.8 16.3 21.2 24.5
4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%) 46.4 45.4 47.2 48.3 46.1 46.2
2: Fair (%) 23.8 25.2 22.6 25.9 23.6 22.6
1: Poor (%) 9.0 8.5 9.4 9.5 9.1 6.6
  All Women Men AfAm White Other
Rate financial aid advisor staff 29.4 28.7 29.9 23.3 29.9 33.0
4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%) 48.8 48.8 48.9 47.9 49.3 45.9
2: Fair (%) 15.7 17.6 14.1 21.9 14.5 17.4
1: Poor (%) 6.1 4.9 7.1 6.8 6.3 3.7

Back to Top


For more information on the 2002-2003 Graduating Senior Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: September, 2003

Download a Microsoft Excel Version of this report.


Return to 2002-2003 Graduating Senior Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page