North Carolina State University
2004-2005 Graduating Senior Survey:
Gender and Racial/Ethnic Comparisons of
Academic Environment

This document reports survey data on gender and racial/ethnic differences in the respondents' overall assessment of the academic environment at NC State. Survey results for all respondents are provided in "2004-2005 Graduating Senior Survey: All Respondents." For information about the survey and analysis methods, see "2004-2005 Graduating Senior Survey: Introduction, Methods, and Student Demographic Profile."

Satisfaction with Education | Quality of Instruction | Intellectual Environment | Faculty Contributions


Satisfaction with Education

Q Choose NC State again?

  NCSU Women Men AfAm White Other
Choose NC State again?
77.4
79.1
75.7
70.5
78.6
71.8
Yes
%
No
%
6.7
6.2
7.2
11.5
5.9
10.0
Not sure
%
15.9
14.7
17.0
18.0
15.4
18.2
Total
N
2,229
1,091
1,138
200
1,859
170
Back to Top

Q Choose same major again?

  NCSU Women Men AfAm White Other
Choose same major again?
64.1
64.2
64.0
63.4
64.2
63.2
Yes
%
No
%
14.6
14.2
15.0
15.6
14.0
20.0
Not sure
%
21.3
21.6
21.1
21.0
21.8
16.8
Total
N
2,015
999
1,016
186
1,674
155
Back to Top

Q Recommend NCSU to a friend?

  NCSU Women Men AfAm White Other
Recommend NCSU to a friend?
89.6
90.8
88.5
87.8
90.1
87.1
Yes
%
No
%
3.0
2.7
3.3
5.1
2.6
4.7
Not sure
%
7.4
6.5
8.2
7.1
7.3
8.2
Total
N
2,220
1,087
1,133
197
1,852
171


Quality of Instruction

Q Quality of instruction in major

Quality of instruction in major  NCSU Women Men AfAm White Other
Mean rating
3.41
3.47
3.36
3.32
3.43
3.33
4: Excellent
%
50.9
54.3
47.6
43.5
52.1
46.2
3: Good
%
40.4
38.5
42.2
46.5
39.6
42.1
2: Fair
%
7.7
6.8
8.6
8.0
7.5
9.9
1: Poor
%
1.0
0.4
1.6
2.0
0.8
1.8
Total
N
2,227
1,090
1,137
200
1,856
171
Back to Top

Q Quality of instruction overall

Quality of instruction overall  NCSU Women Men AfAm White Other
Mean rating
3.15
3.21
3.10
3.10
3.16
3.16
4: Excellent
%
27.3
29.4
25.3
26.5
27.1
30.4
3: Good
%
61.3
62.2
60.5
59.0
62.0
56.7
2: Fair
%
10.6
7.9
13.3
12.5
10.4
11.7
1: Poor
%
0.7
0.5
1.0
2.0
0.5
1.2
Total
N
2,226
1,090
1,136
200
1,855
171
Back to Top

Q Overall Education at NC State

Evaluate overall education received  NCSU Women Men AfAm White Other
Mean rating
3.37
3.42
3.33
3.29
3.38
3.34
4: Excellent
%
43.6
46.3
41.0
38.5
44.4
40.8
3: Good
%
50.6
49.4
51.7
52.0
50.2
52.7
2: Fair
%
5.3
4.1
6.3
9.0
4.8
5.9
1: Poor
%
0.6
0.2
1.0
0.5
0.6
0.6
Total
N
2,223
1,087
1,136
200
1,854
169
Back to Top


Intellectual Environment

Q Intellectual environment on campus

Intellectual environment on campus  NCSU Women Men AfAm White Other
Mean rating
3.17
3.22
3.13
3.26
3.17
3.09
4: Very strong
%
26.2
27.9
24.5
30.2
26.0
23.5
3: Strong
%
65.6
66.2
65.0
65.3
65.9
62.4
2: Weak
%
7.7
5.7
9.6
4.5
7.5
13.5
1: Very weak
%
0.5
0.2
0.9
.
0.6
0.6
Total
N
2,222
1,088
1,134
199
1,853
170
Back to Top

 


Q Faculty Contributions

  Mean Rating
(based on a scale of 4 = "excellent," 3 = "good" 2 = "fair," 1 = "poor")
  NCSU Women Men AfAm White Other
Faculty: Set high expectations for learning
3.45
3.52
3.38
3.39
3.46
3.35
Faculty: Respect diverse talents/ways of learning
3.19
3.24
3.15
3.05
3.21
3.18
Faculty: Encourage actively involved learning
3.26
3.32
3.20
3.24
3.27
3.16
Faculty: Encourage student-faculty interaction
3.15
3.21
3.09
3.11
3.17
3.04
Faculty: Give frequent and prompt feedback
3.14
3.22
3.07
3.10
3.16
3.06
Faculty: Encourage devoting time/energy to coursework
3.39
3.44
3.34
3.36
3.40
3.27
Faculty: Opp. to learn cooperatively with fellow students
3.27
3.30
3.25
3.15
3.30
3.19
Faculty: Care about your academic success and welfare
3.18
3.24
3.13
3.03
3.21
3.09
Faculty: Evaluation on all eight measures
3.27
3.33
3.22
3.18
3.29
3.18
View Frequency Distributions

Back to Top


For more information on the 2004-2005 Graduating Senior Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: October, 2005

Return to 2004-2005 Graduating Senior Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page