Overview
This report presents the findings of a survey of graduating seniors at North Carolina State University conducted in April of 1995. The obtained sample represents 52.1% of the spring 1995 graduating senior class. No significant differences by gender, ethnicity, or college were observed between the sample obtained and the population of spring 1995 graduating seniors. However, significant differences in response by gender and by ethnicity were found for many of the questions.
In addition to answering a series of specific questions, students
gave general comments about their experiences at NC State and
suggested steps that could be taken to improve the quality of
the undergraduate experience at NC State. Over 94 pages of commentary
were received and have been integrated into this report to the
extent feasible.
Summary
The following summary is organized to reflect the contextual
relevancy of the findings to NC State's recently adopted strategic
plan. Therefore, survey findings are clustered under relevant
goals.
Strategic Plan Goal #1: NC State will improve success and
satisfaction of undergraduate and graduate students, faculty,
and staff.
Student Satisfaction with Academic Experiences
Respondents reported differential rates of satisfaction with many aspects of the NC State educational experience, as follows:
Student Satisfaction with Activities and Services
As part of the survey, respondents rated their satisfaction with the quality of NC State student services and campus related activities. At least two thirds of all graduating seniors reported at least moderate satisfaction with all services and activities, with the exception of financial aid services and food service on campus.
Outcomes of General Education
Respondents reported that NC State contributed highly through the collegiate experience in areas of technical skills development such as enhancing analytic skills. Lower levels of collegiate educational contribution were perceived in development of attitudes and values, with the lowest being advancing appreciation of the arts.
Student Goal Achievement
Student Personal Development
Most respondents reported high or very high current developmental levels on personal characteristics, but reported a relatively lower rating for the educational contribution through the NC State experience to their current developmental level on personal characteristics.
Time to Degree Completion
Most respondents reported entering NC State as freshmen, and more than half of all respondents (56.4%) indicated that they were able to obtain their degree in 8 semesters.
Plans After Graduation
The majority (85.0%) of all respondents reported that, as of April, 1995, they were either already employed, still looking for employment, or were planning on continuing their education at the graduate level.
Employment/Internships while at NC State
Almost three-quarters (74.2%) of all respondents indicated that they had worked during the academic year at NC State.
Employment Following Graduation
The majority of respondents who reported having accepted a position were able to find full-time work, and in most cases reported a close connection between the major in which they graduated and their employment following graduation.
Environment for Learning
A number of respondents commented on the aesthetic quality of the NC State campus, the cleanliness of campus buildings, the quality of facilities, and the upkeep of older buildings.
Personal Safety
Relatively low ratings were indicated by respondents for personal safety on campus; numerous comments were received on this issue, especially from female respondents.
Choice of Major
A prevalent theme in open-ended comments was the request that students be given more time before having to choose a major and more information on the majors available.
Strategic Plan Goal #6: NC State will expand multicultural
and global awareness among the members of the university community,
in its curricula, and through international partnerships.
Strategic Plan Goal #7: NC State will achieve a diverse
student body, faculty and staff that better reflect contemporary
society.
Campus Climate
The campus climate was generally seen as being supportive towards diverse subgroups of students, but significant differences were observed by gender in the perception of campus climate for men and by ethnicity in perception of campus climate for African Americans.
Campus Diversity Issues
Many significant differences in response were found by race and gender in the sections for Campus Climate, Student Goal Achievement, Student Personal Development, Plans After Graduation, and Employment and Internships while at NC State.
Return to Table of Contents
Return to OIRP Survey Page
Purpose
The purpose of the 1995 Graduating Senior Survey was to gather current information of all seniors graduating in the spring of 1995 at NC State. The UNC Board of Governors requested that the University of North Carolina - General Administration obtain information from these students in order to more accurately to portray the experiences of undergraduates at NC State.
At NC State, individual academic departments as well as schools
or colleges were given the opportunity to insert discipline-specific
items such that distinct information about unit-level institutional
effectiveness information could be provided. The inclusion of
these inserts offered academic units the chance to collect valuable
information on student outcomes and student opinions.
Description of Sample
This report presents a profile of the Spring 1995 graduating seniors at NC State. It is based on responses to a survey given during the final semester prior to spring 1995 graduation. A copy of the survey instrument appears in the Appendix.
The total number of students registered to graduate in the spring
of 1995 was 2,098. Completed surveys were received from 1,138.
Of those returned, 44 students did not graduate. A total of
1,094 usable surveys were analyzed, representing 52.1% of the
spring 1995 graduating senior class. Results of Chi-square tests
revealed no significant differences from the total population
of graduating seniors in the areas of gender, ethnicity, or college
at the 0.05 significance level. Thus, the results may be regarded
as broadly representative of the graduating class. An outline
of the report is presented below.
Outline of Report
Student Goal Achievement
- Academic
Presents responses to questions dealing with students primary
goal or objective for attending NC State and to what extent that
goal was realized (questions 3-4).
- Value to student
Presents responses to questions dealing with choosing to attend
NC State and the major field of study (questions 30-31).
Campus Climate
Provides responses to assess the perceived campus climate for
different subpopulations of students (question 12).
Student Personal Development
These questions provide information on students' current level
of development of personal characteristics, as well as the extent
to which they feel their college education has contributed to
this level (question 14).
Student Satisfaction
Presents overall responses to level of satisfaction with the
quality of the NC State educational experience in areas such as
field/program, curriculum, facilities, opportunities, and services
(question 11).
Outcomes of General Education
These questions provide information on how the University has
contributed to student's growth in the areas of skills and knowledge,
as well as information on student goals and goal achievement.
(questions 2, 5-10, 13).
Time to Degree Completion
Presents responses to the question of time spent to acquire a
degree and, if applicable, reasons for taking more than 8 semesters
(questions 15-17).
Plans After Graduation
Presents responses dealing with plans following graduation, including
graduate or professional programs (questions 18-21).
Employment and Internships at NC State
Describes information relating to work during the academic year
while at NC State, including participation in the Co-Op program
(questions 22-25).
Post-Graduation Employment
Reports the nature of employment following graduation, including
information on educational requirements, relationship to academic
major and salary range (questions 26-29).
Campus Diversity Issues
A broad-based discussion of survey results as they pertain
to campus diversity.
Emerging Issues
A summary of themes that emerged through open-ended respondent
commentary.
Return to Table of Contents
Return to OIRP Survey Page
This section presents responses to questions dealing with achievement of student goals and objectives, as well as their perceptions of the overall value of their NC State experience. The breakdown of student goals is as follows: 55.0% of graduating senior respondents indicated a primary goal of obtaining a bachelor's degree as preparation for a new career or profession; 28.0% listed obtaining a bachelor's degree as preparation for graduate or professional school as their primary objective; and 14% gave obtaining a bachelor's degree or certificate only as their primary goal (see Table 1). A larger percentage of males (59.0%) than females (50.0%) attended NC State to obtain a bachelor's degree as preparation for a new career or profession.
In Table 1, as in all subsequent tables, the percentages given are the percent of category response for each column, with each column summing to 100.0% (plus or minus 0.1 % due to rounding error).
Primary goal for attending NC State (%) | ||||||
Bachelor degree/certificate | ||||||
Bachelor degree/preparation for school | ||||||
Bachelor degree/preparation for career | ||||||
Improve knowledge, skills, & competencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Courses for personal interest | ||||||
Other |
The graduating seniors were asked to what extent they accomplished
their primary goal or objective for attending NC State; responses
are reported in Table 2.
Accomplished primary goal (%) | ||||||
Fully accomplished | ||||||
Partially accomplished | ||||||
Not accomplished |
In addition to academic goal achievement, graduating seniors
were asked two global questions regarding a retrospective evaluation
of their choice of school and major field of study. Most senior
respondents (88.0%) indicated they would choose NC State again,
but the percentage of seniors indicating they would choose their
major again was noticeably lower (78.4%). There were no significant
differences by gender in either response area, but there were
significant differences by race (p = 0.001) in respondent's choice
of attending NC State again. See Tables 3 and 4.
Choose NC State again (%) | ||||||
Yes | ||||||
No |
Choose major again (%) | ||||||
Yes | ||||||
No |
Return to Table of Contents
Return to OIRP Survey Page
Back to Top
CAMPUS CLIMATE
This section reports graduating senior ratings of the perceived campus climate for different subpopulations of students. A broader discussion of campus diversity issues is included later in this report.
Most respondents indicated the perception of campus climate for
women as being mildly to strongly supportive (76.2%). No significant
differences were observed between male and female responses to
this question. See Table 5.
Women (%) | |||
Strong Discrimination | |||
Mild Discrimination | |||
Neutral | |||
Mild Support | |||
Strong Support |
Table 6 indicates that the perceived campus climate for men was seen as being mildly to strongly supportive by 72.6% graduating senior respondents. Females indicated a significantly stronger perception of support for men on campus than did males at the p = 0.001 significance level.
Men (%) | |||
Strong Discrimination | |||
Mild Discrimination | |||
Neutral | |||
Mild Support | |||
Strong Support |
The campus climate for African Americans (Table 7) was perceived
by 70.8% of all respondents as being mildly or strongly supportive.
Significant differences were observed between respondents of
different races (p = 0.001), as follows: The greatest amount
of support for African Americans was seen by white respondents,
with 72.8% seeing a mildly to strongly supportive campus environment;
54.8% of other ethnic minorities saw a mildly to strongly supportive
environment for African Americans at NC State; only 45.2% of African
American respondents saw the campus climate for African Americans
as being mildly to strongly supportive. 38.1% of African American
respondents perceived the climate at NC State as being mildly
to strongly discriminatory.
African Americans (%) | ||||
Strong Discrimination | ||||
Mild Discrimination | ||||
Neutral | ||||
Mild Support | ||||
Strong Support |
In general, respondents felt that other ethnic minorities are
neither supported nor discriminated against. A similar distribution
was reported across ethnic categories. See Table 8.
Other Ethnic Minorities (%) | ||||
Strong Discrimination | ||||
Mild Discrimination | ||||
Neutral | ||||
Mild Support | ||||
Strong Support |
Similar to the campus climate for other ethnic minorities, the
graduating senior respondents felt that international students
are neither supported not discriminated against. This holds for
both genders and all ethnicities. See Table 9.
International Students (%) | ||||||
Strong Discrimination | ||||||
Mild Discrimination | ||||||
Neutral | ||||||
Mild Support | ||||||
Strong Support |
Responses regarding the campus climate at NC State for disabled
students are displayed in Table 10. In general, the climate was
perceived as neutral to mildly supportive across gender and ethnicity.
Notably, however, 14.3% of respondents perceived the campus climate
for disabled students as being mildly to strongly discriminatory.
Disabled Students (%) | ||||||
Strong Discrimination | ||||||
Mild Discrimination | ||||||
Neutral | ||||||
Mild Support | ||||||
Strong Support |
Respondents' assessment of the campus climate for gay and lesbian
students is presented in Table 11. Overall, the graduating seniors
indicated a neutral orientation on this issue or perceived mild
discrimination. African Americans indicated the highest perception
of discrimination against gay and lesbian students at NC State,
with 51.2% seeing mild to strong discrimination.
Gay and Lesbian Students (%) | ||||||
Strong Discrimination | ||||||
Mild Discrimination | ||||||
Neutral | ||||||
Mild Support | ||||||
Strong Support |
In Table 12 contains mean ratings of support for the different
groups of students, with mean scores ranked from highest to lowest
for the total group. The responses were on a scale of 1 to 5,
where 5 = strong support, 4 = mild support, 3 = neutral, 2 =
mild discrimination, and 1 = strong discrimination. Graduating
seniors felt strongly that gay and lesbian students received notably
less support as a group than any other group assessed.
Student Group | |||||||
Men | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Women | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
African Americans | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Other Ethnic Minorities | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
International Students | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Disabled Students | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Gay & Lesbian Students | mean: | ||||||
sd: |
Return to Table of Contents
Return to OIRP Survey Page
Back to Top
STUDENT PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT
This section provides ratings of graduating seniors' estimates of their growth and development on personal characteristics, as well as their estimates of the extent to which the NC State experience contributed to their current level of development in these areas.
The area that the graduating seniors felt that they achieved the highest current level of personal development was in their independence and self-reliance; their lowest perceived area of development was in their ability to handle stress. The area in which graduating seniors reported the highest level of educational contribution to personal characteristics was their potential for success; their lowest perceived area of educational contribution to personal characteristics was their sense of personal identity.
Respondents were asked to rate their current level of development
on six personal characteristics. The scale used was: 5 = very
high, 4 = high, 3 = average, 2 = low, and 1 = very low. The means
and standard deviations for each characteristic, ranked from high
to low means for the total group, are listed in Table 13. Significant
differences at the p = 0.01 level were found between African American
students and the other ethnic categories in the area of current
developmental level of personal characteristics, with African
American respondents consistently rating themselves higher than
either white students or students of other ethnic minorities.
There were also significant differences by gender at the p =
0.001 significance level, with men reporting consistently higher
levels of development than women.
Characteristic | |||||||
Independence & self-reliance | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Potential for success | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Sense of personal identity | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Coping with change | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Self-confidence | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Ability to handle stress | mean: | ||||||
sd: |
Respondents were also asked to rate the level of contribution to current developmental levels that they would attribute to their education at NC State. The scale used was: 5 = very greatly, 4 = greatly, 3 = moderately, 2 = little, and 1 = very little. The means and standard deviations for each characteristic, ranked from high to low for the total group, are displayed in Table 14. A significant difference was found by gender, with female respondents reporting a higher level of educational contribution to their sense of personal identity than male respondents (p = 0.0005). No significant differences by ethnicity were observed.
Characteristic | |||||||
Potential for success | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Independence & self-reliance | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Ability to handle stress | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Coping with change | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Self-confidence | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Sense of personal identity | mean: | ||||||
sd: |
Table 15 displays the gap scores, which are defined as the difference
between the mean score for students' perception of growth and
development on personal characteristics and the mean score for
the extent to which respondents attributed a contribution through
the NC State experience to their development on personal characteristics.
The values for the gap scores can be interpreted in the following
manner: Larger positive gap scores indicate perceived shortcomings
in the level of educational contribution to development of personal
characteristics, and indicate what areas may be priority targets
for improvement. Negative gap scores indicate areas in which goals
were exceeded Of particular note is the large gap score for African
American respondents with regard to sense of personal identity.
Difference in Means | ||||||
Sense of personal identity | ||||||
Independence & self-reliance | ||||||
Coping with change | ||||||
Self-confidence | ||||||
Potential for success | ||||||
Ability to handle stress |
Return to Table of Contents
Return to OIRP Survey Page
STUDENT SATISFACTION
This section provides ratings on reported levels of satisfaction students felt with the quality of 29 university experiences, student facilities, offices, or activities.
The areas with which graduating seniors reported the highest satisfaction were instruction in major field/program, opportunity to join campus clubs and organizations, diversity of courses overall, registration processes, and internships, co-ops, and practica; the areas in which they reported the least satisfaction were academic advising, personal safety on campus, career planning and placement services, residence halls, services for commuter students, financial aid services, and food service on campus.
A considerable amount of valuable information was also gained from the open-ended questions (questions 32 and 33) which asked for general comments on the respondents' experiences at NC State and areas of particular satisfaction/dissatisfaction. In relation to satisfaction with NC State, most respondents who expressed an opinion reported that they were satisfied with their experiences overall while at NC State. These respondents did, however, express concern for specific areas of academic life and student services that they felt needed to be improved. These suggestions are presented along with the tables and analysis for each individual question.
Differences in response between gender and ethnic categories
that were found to be significant at the p = 0.001 level are reported
for each question. In cases where the response to "don't
know/did not use" is greater than 5.0%, an auxiliary table
is presented to provide the percentage of respondents who reported
not being aware of the service or not utilizing it.
Instruction
Table 16 illustrates that most respondents (94.3%) were at least
moderately satisfied with the instruction they received in their
major field or program. One graduate in Accounting wrote "I
was particularly satisfied with the faculty in the Accounting
Department. The faculty was enthusiastic and extremely knowledgeable
on the subjects they were teaching." There were many positive
comments relating to specific instructors, but there were also
concerns expressed in open-ended comments from students in Physical
and Mathematical Sciences, Agriculture and Life Sciences, Engineering,
and other research-oriented disciplines that too much of a focus
on research was occurring at the expense of emphasizing quality
teaching.
Instruction in major (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Overall instruction at NC State was also rated highly by graduating
seniors, with 94.1% reporting at least moderate satisfaction.
One graduate in Communication who had a prior undergraduate degree
from UNC-CH commented "I feel that my education at NCSU has
been far superior to the one I received at UNC. The professors
genuinely care about whether or not their students succeed. At
Carolina I was just a number. At NCSU, I have a name and that
does a lot for a person's self-confidence." Women rated
overall instruction significantly higher than men (p = 0.0008),
with 96.1% of women moderately to very satisfied and 92.8% of
men moderately to very satisfied. See Table 17.
Overall instruction (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Diversity of Courses
The majority of respondents (86.6%) indicated at least moderate
satisfaction with the diversity of courses in their major field
of study. Individual comments on course diversity were many,
but two themes were most prevalent. First was the issue of increasing
the diversity of major requirements. Respondents from non-humanities
and technical curricula repeatedly requested a more diverse curriculum
that included more humanities and social science requirements.
For example, a graduating senior in Biochemistry stated "I
do wish more, in fact, many more general courses were required
for people in the sciences so we [become] a little more diverse
in our skills..." Of concern to respondents from humanities
and social sciences curricula was the need for more courses specifically
related to their major (e.g., more writing and less literature
courses for a journalism major). Second was the issue of curriculum
focus. Respondents from many different curricula requested inclusion
of additional coursework in their major field of study. In addition,
many respondents expressed a desire for courses that involved
applying skills that they would need to work in their field.
Diversity of major courses (%) |
||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Satisfaction with the overall diversity of courses experienced
by graduating seniors while at NC State was high, with 90.1% reporting
at least moderate satisfaction. There were significant differences
by gender (p = 0.0001), with a greater percentage of women (92.0%)
than men (88.7%) at least moderately satisfied. A wide range
of comments were received on this issue, ranging from requests
for a less diverse overall curriculum to increasing the number
of free electives. Most comments, however, did favor some kind
of increase in diversity of classes overall. A graduating senior
in Zoology commented "I feel the new 'General Education'
requirement is a great idea for improving the quality of education
at NCSU. Please continue to offer more programs [that] will make
NCSU graduates more well rounded."
Diversity of courses overall (%) |
||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Availability of Courses
Most respondents (79.3%) reported at least moderate satisfaction
with the availability of courses in their major field of study.
The main phenomenon with which respondents reported dissatisfaction
in the area of major course availability was the fact that for
some majors, course requirements for the major were only offered
once per year. This was reported by some respondents as being
the reason that they did not participate in any outside internship
or cooperative education. A graduating senior in Chemical Engineering
wrote "Unfortunately, the majority of core classes in CHE
are only offered once a year, turning many potential Co-Op students
away..."
Availability of major courses (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Satisfaction with availability of courses overall at NC State
was also high, with 87.1% of graduating seniors reporting at least
moderate satisfaction. A significant difference was found by
gender (p = 0.0008), with 89.6% of female respondents moderately
to very satisfied vs. 85.4% of male respondents moderately to
very satisfied. Dissatisfaction with course availability appeared
to be mainly from those respondents who were not able to attend
classes during the day. Complaints from those respondents pertained
to the overall scarcity of available classes, with physical education
classes in particular being mentioned repeatedly. For example,
a Business Management student commented "I have worked full-time
and taken classes at night to get my degree. I had a difficult
time finding PEs to fit [into] my schedule..."
Availability of courses overall (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Adequacy of Classroom and Laboratory Facilities
According to graduating senior respondents, 79.5% were at least
moderately satisfied with classroom facilities at NC State. Primary
reasons mentioned by respondents for dissatisfaction with classroom
facilities were these: lack of cleanliness, lack of prompt and
proper maintenance, age of furnishings, size of facilities, and
lack of adequate climate control.
Adequacy of classroom facilities (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
In regard to the adequacy of the laboratory facilities, 74.5%
of graduating senior respondents reported at least moderate satisfaction
with those at NC State. Reasons given by respondents for being
dissatisfied with laboratory facilities at NC State were as follows:
worn out/out of date equipment, lack of funding for materials,
and lack of availability. Many respondents did not give specific
reasons for dissatisfaction, but did indicate that an overall
improvement in the quality of laboratory facilities was needed.
Adequacy of laboratory facilities (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Academic Advising
When asked about academic advising, approximately two-thirds
(68.0%) of the respondents reported that they were at least moderately
satisfied with the quality of academic advising. On the other
hand, fully 32.0% reported being moderately or very dissatisfied.
See Table 24 for a breakdown of these percentages.
Academic advising (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
A surprising number of comments were received on this issue (71 total, with 6 positive and 65 negative). Those respondents who commented positively on academic advising reported having an advisor who took a personal interest in them or otherwise went out of the way to provide them with some type of academic or personal assistance.
Respondents who had negative comments on academic advising fell into four specific categories. There were respondents who were dissatisfied with their advisor's lack of knowledge of rules, regulations, policies, and procedures and who reported academic setbacks due to this lack of knowledge. One student said "I would be graduating in May with a double degree if it had not been for my advisors' mistakes. They told me that certain classes would count that didn't for specific requirements..." There were respondents who reported feeling a lack of interest, caring, or involvement on the part of their advisor with the advising process and with specific student concerns. A College of Engineering graduate stated "Academic advising was not personal enough - with so many students, it was hard to build a relationship and feel that the advisor was familiar with my particular needs, strengths, and weaknesses as a student..." Then there were those respondents who indicated feeling that the quality of advising for entering freshmen needed to be improved. An area of particular concern was advising in the University Undesignated curriculum as regards selection of an academic major. Finally, there were those respondents who did not have any significant complaints but were dissatisfied with the overall quality of academic advising (e.g., "improve advising", "better advising").
Prior information was obtained on the subject of student satisfaction
with academic advising as a part of the 1993 Self-Study Survey
of undergraduates. Table 24A displays the percentage response
for satisfaction with the quality of academic advising from the
Self-Study Survey side by side with the corresponding percentages
for the Graduating Senior Survey (both calculated with no opinion
responses omitted). For the two middle categories, the first
(non-italicized) response is the response category as given for
the Self-Study Survey, while the second (italicized) response
is the response category as given for the Graduating Senior Survey.
74.7% of Self-Study Survey respondents reported being satisfied
or very satisfied. Only 68.0% of Graduating Senior Survey respondents
reported being moderately or very satisfied with the quality of
academic advising. While these two rating scales are not an exact
match and while the Self-Study Survey of undergraduates was a
cross-sectional survey by class level, it is still meaningful
to note a general decrease in the satisfaction rating for academic
advising based on the two most recent and most comprehensive indices
of student satisfaction available.
Academic advising (%) | ||
Very Dissatisfied | ||
Dissatisfied/Moderately Dissatisfied | ||
Satisfied/Moderately Satisfied | ||
Very Satisfied |
Interaction with Faculty
At least moderate satisfaction with opportunities for interaction
with faculty outside of the classroom was reported by 77.7% of
respondents. One graduate from the College of Agriculture and
Life Sciences wrote "I felt the education was excellent as
well as the teacher - student interaction having it be such a
big school..." However, concern was expressed by some respondents
that faculty seemed to be unavailable for interaction outside
the classroom due to time constraints imposed by research obligations.
An Electrical Engineering graduate commented "Some of the
courses in my major were disappointing because the instructor
was doing research and could not help with outside questions because
he/she was unavailable..."
Opportunity for interaction with faculty (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Academic Support Services
Of those spring 1995 respondents (n = 660) who reported utilizing
academic support services at NC State, 82.3% indicated at least
moderate satisfaction with the quality of service they received
(Table 26). Significant differences were found by gender (p =
0.0009), with 86.3% of female respondents moderately to very satisfied
and 78.9% of male respondents moderately to very satisfied. It
is important to note that of the 1,081 seniors responding to this
question, 38.9% (n = 421) indicated that they didn't know about
or did not use these services (Table 26A).
Academic support services (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Academic support services (%) | ||||||
Don't know/did not use |
Career Planning and Placement
Of those respondents who reported using career services/employment
assistance (n = 869), 68.7% stated at least moderate satisfaction
with the quality of these services at NC State (see Table 27).
Of the 1,087 graduating seniors who answered this question, 20.1%
(n = 218) reported that they did not know about or did not use
career services/employment assistance. See Table 27A. The comments
on this issue reflected strongly held opinions. Graduates from
programs with specific employment outcomes (e.g., College of Textiles,
College of Engineering, College of Management, and College of
Forest Resources) were particularly satisfied with placement
services. One respondent from the College of Textiles wrote "Career
Planning and Placement is the one department I believe works very
hard and does an excellent job for all those willing to work and
seek employment..." Respondents from the programs that did
not have specific employment outcomes (e.g., College of Humanities
and Social Sciences and College of Education and Psychology) reported
less satisfaction with placement services. Respondents from these
programs commented that they perceived a preference towards assisting
students from the technical curricula while their needs were not
as well attended to. A graduate from the College of Humanities
and Social Sciences wrote "Humanities students get very little
direction for [their] careers and the career and planning center
concentrates on engineers..."
Career services /employment assistance (%) |
| |||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Career services/employment assistance (%) |
| |||||
Don't know/did not use |
Financial Aid Services
Table 28 shows that of those graduating seniors who reported utilizing financial aid services (n = 594), 60.8% were at least moderately satisfied; of the 1,074 respondents answering this question, 44.7% (n = 480) indicated they didn't know about or did not use financial aid services. See Table 28A. 39.2% of respondents reported being either moderately or very dissatisfied with financial aid services, and while some of this may be attributed to respondents receiving low awards or no aid at all, there were some specific reasons given as part of the commentary. One repeatedly stated reason was the perceived lack of adequate customer service training for financial aid staff. One College of Textiles graduate stated "[In] many organizations such as Financial Aid and the Textile Library workers should be trained in customer services... They should be informed that their ability to meet students' needs [is] necessary for continuing employment with the University."
Financial aid services (%) |
||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Financial aid services (%) | ||||||
Don't know/did not use |
Residence Halls
Of those respondents who indicated living in residence halls
while at NC State (n = 746), 71.8% were at least moderately satisfied
with the quality of their living experience (see Table 29); of
the 1,077 graduating seniors who answered this question, 30.7%
(n = 331) reported they either didn't know about or did not use
the residence halls (see Table 29A). Respondents had varied comments
on this subject. Some respondents focused on physical plant and
maintenance issues such as lack of air conditioning, age and disrepair
of some buildings, lack of adequate computer facilities, lack
of adequate residence hall parking, and perceived inadequacies
in the performance of cleaning staff. Others were more concerned
with social issues such as increased social activities, improved
selection processes for Resident Assistants, and stricter enforcement
of campus alcohol policies.
Residence halls (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Residence halls (%) | ||||||
Don't know/did not use |
Services for Commuter Students
When asked about the quality of services for commuter students,
66.4% of respondents who commuted (n = 643) indicated at least
moderate satisfaction. These results are presented in Table 30.
Of the 1,072 respondents who answered this question 40.0% (n =
429) either did not know about or did not utilize these services.
See Table 30A. Many commuter respondents stated that cost of
parking stickers and lack of consistent availability of parking
spaces were the two greatest sources of dissatisfaction with these
services. A graduating senior in Philosophy and Religion commented
"Provide parking for commuters - this experience was so miserable
for me that I will never contribute a dime to the University..."
Services for commuter students (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Services for commuter students (%) | ||||||
Don't know/did not use |
Food Service on Campus
Respondents who used food service on campus (n = 849) expressed
somewhat more satisfaction than dissatisfaction with food service
on campus, with 56.9% moderately to very satisfied and 43.1% moderately
to very dissatisfied. Of the 1,074 graduating seniors who responded
to this question, 20.9% (n = 225) didn't know about or did not
use campus food service. Respondents who commented on this question
expressed a desire for a greater variety of food service options
on campus. They also requested food items that were both nutritious
and moderately priced. Representative comments on the subject
included: "The food is getting better, but prices are outrageous
for college students to pay..." "I think the food selections
at NCSU are terrible. What on campus is good for you?"
Food service on campus (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Food service on campus (%) | ||||||
Don't know/did not use |
Library Services
The majority of graduating seniors were pleased with the quality
of NC State library services, with 80.0% of respondents reporting
at least moderate satisfaction. See Table 32. There were two
prevalent themes in the comments about library services. First,
respondents indicated concern about the age and outdated nature
of some of the library materials. A respondent from Agricultural
Education suggested "Try to update many of the book and articles
in the library. As an Agricultural Education major, I found lots
of books in D.H. Hill [that] date back to 1920 - 1950. This is
not good reference material for our classroom assignments..."
Reduction of subscriptions to journals and research periodicals
was the other main area of concern. Respondents repeatedly mentioned
having to utilize libraries at other local institutions of higher
learning such as Duke University and UNC-Chapel Hill. An Electrical
Engineering graduate said "Improve the library. I've had
to go to UNC-CH to do research several times..."
Library services (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Computer Labs
Satisfaction with the quality of computer lab/center services
was also high, with 73.6% of respondents who reported using them
(n = 1,013) moderately to very satisfied. These results are presented
in Table 33 . Of the 1,086 graduating seniors who answered this
question, only 6.7% (n = 73) indicated that the did not know about
or did not use computer lab/center services. See Table 33A (see
page 20). The comments on computer facilities focused on having
more computer labs (both on campus and in the residence halls)
and increasing the hours of operation for those labs that are
currently available to students.
Computer lab/center services (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Computer lab/center services (%) | ||||||
Don't know/did not use |
Other Student Services
The majority of respondents (77.2%) were at least moderately satisfied with bookstore services and products. Responses were found to be significantly different by gender (p = 0.0001), with 80.7% of women moderately to very satisfied and 74.7% of men moderately to very satisfied.
Bookstore services and products (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Satisfaction with the registration process at NC State was high,
with 88.5% of respondents reporting at least moderate satisfaction.
Registration process (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Table 36 shows that satisfaction with the business office and cashier was high, with 82.3% of respondents who reported using those services (n = 842) stating at least moderate satisfaction; of the 1,072 respondents to this question, 21.5% (n = 230) either didn't know about or did not use the business office and cashier. See Table 36A.
Business office/cashier (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Business office/cashier (%) | ||||||
Don't know/did not use |
Of those graduating seniors who reported using the Counseling
Center (n = 326), 80.0% were at least moderately satisfied. See
table 37. It should be noted, however, that of the 1,072 graduating
seniors who answered this question, 69.6% (n = 746) indicated
that they didn't know about or did not use the Counseling Center.
See table 37A.
Counseling center (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Counseling Center (%) | ||||||
Don't know/did not use |
Satisfaction with the quality of service from the office of Registration and Records at NC State was quite high, with 87.6% of respondents (n = 1,023) stating that they were moderately to very satisfied. See Table 38. Of the 1,080 respondents to this question, only 5.3% (n = 57) reported that they did not know about or did not use the services of this office. See Table 38A.
Registration and Records (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Registration and Records (%) | ||||||
Don't know/did not use |
When asked about the quality of student health services at NC State, 81.3% of respondents who used them (n = 910) indicated that they were moderately to very satisfied with the quality of these services. The percentages are displayed in Table 39. Of the 1,078 respondents answering this question, 15.6% (n = 168) reported that they did not know about or did not use these services.
Student health services (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Student health services (%) | ||||||
Don't know/did not use |
Student Activities
The majority of respondents (89.4%) who participated in campus-sponsored
recreational activities were at least moderately satisfied (n
= 742). See Table 40. It should be noted that of the 1,078 respondents
to this question, 31.2% (n = 336) didn't know about or did not
participate in these activities. See Table 40A.
Campus-sponsored recreational opportunities (%) |
| |||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Campus-sponsored recreational opportunities. (%) |
| |||||
Don't know/did not use |
The opportunity to participate in co-curricular activities while
at NC State was reported as being at least moderately satisfactory
by 82.3% of graduating seniors (n = 797). Women reported a significantly
higher level of satisfaction than men (p = 0.0001), with 86.3%
of female respondents moderately to very satisfied and 78.9% of
male respondents moderately to very satisfied. See Table 41.
Approximately one fourth (26.3%) of the 1,081 respondents to
this question reported that they did not know about or did not
participate in co-curricular activities (n = 284) . See table
41A. Most comments on this issue focused on publicizing activities
better or on having more activities available at varied times
to allow greater participation.
Opportunity to participate in co-curricular activities (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Opportunity to participate in co-curricular activities (%) | ||||||
Don't know/did not use |
Table 42 shows that of those graduating seniors who indicated participation in internships, co-ops, and field experiences or practica (n = 607), 83.7% were at least moderately satisfied with the experience. Female participants rated the experience significantly higher than male participants (p = 0.0001), with 90.5% of women moderately to very satisfied and 79.4% of men moderately to very satisfied. Of the 1,076 seniors who answered this question, 43.6% (n = 469) stated that they did not know about or did not participate in these activities. See Table 42A.
Internships/co-ops/field experiences/practica (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Internships/co-ops/field experiences/practica (%) | ||||||
Don't know/did not use |
Of the respondents who reported participation (n = 884), 93.7%
reported being moderately to very satisfied with the opportunities
to join campus clubs and organizations at NC State; 18.1% (n
= 196) of the 1,080 respondents to this question indicated that
they did not know about or did not participate in these activities.
Opportunities to join clubs/organizations (%) |
| |||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Opportunities to join clubs/organizations. (%) |
| |||||
Don't know/did not use |
Personal Safety on Campus
When asked about their feelings towards personal safety on campus, 72.8% of all respondents (n = 1,010) stated that they were at least moderately satisfied. On the other hand, 27.2% were moderately to very dissatisfied. Responses were found to be significantly different by gender (p = 0.0001), with 78.8% of men moderately to very satisfied and only 64.9% of women moderately to very satisfied. Of the 1,078 respondents answering this question, only 6.3% (n = 68) indicated a response of don't know/did not use to this question. The suggestion most mentioned by respondents as a means for improving personal safety was to improve campus lighting.
Personal safety on campus (%) | ||||||
Very Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Dissatisfied | ||||||
Moderately Satisfied | ||||||
Very Satisfied |
Personal safety on campus (%) | ||||||
Don't know/did not use |
Means and Standard Deviations
The means and standard deviations for questions related to student
satisfaction, ranked from highest to lowest for the total group,
are displayed in Table 45. The scale used was: 4 = very satisfied,
3 = moderately satisfied, 2 = moderately dissatisfied, and 1 =
very dissatisfied. Important to note is that don't know/did not
use responses were omitted in calculating the means.
Level of Student Satisfaction | All |
Female |
Male | White | Other | ||
Instruction in major | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Opportunities to join clubs and organizations | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Diversity of courses overall | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Registration process | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Internships/co-ops/field experiences/practica | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Diversity of major courses | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Campus-sponsored recreational opportunities | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Overall instruction | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Availability of courses overall | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Opportunity participate in co-curricular activities | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Availability of major courses | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Registration & Records | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Academic support services | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Student health services | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Opportunity for interaction with faculty | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Library services | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Counseling center | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Computer lab/center services | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Business office/cashier | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Adequacy of classroom facilities | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Bookstore services & products | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Adequacy of laboratory facilities | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Academic advising | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Personal safety on campus | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Career services/employment assistance | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Residence halls | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Services for commuter students | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Financial aid services | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Food service on campus | mean: | ||||||
sd: |
Summary Charts
To enable the reader to gain an overview of student satisfaction in academic areas, percentage rankings of respondents who reported at least moderate satisfaction with the quality of NC State academic areas are displayed in Chart 1. Important to note is that these percentages were calculated excluding "don't know/did not use" responses.
The percentage of respondents who reported at least moderate
satisfaction with the quality of NC State student services are
ranked from greatest to least in Chart 2. These percentages were
also calculated excluding "don't know/did not use" responses.
Return to Table of Contents
Return to OIRP Survey Page
Back to Top
OUTCOMES OF GENERAL EDUCATION
This section provides ratings of how much respondents felt their education at NC State contributed to areas of growth, personal development, and gain in skills. Responses are also provided for questions on goals established for undergraduate education at NC State, and on the extent to which these goals were realized. Respondents reported high levels of collegiate educational contribution in areas of technical skills development such as enhancing analytic skills and applying scientific methods of inquiry. Lower levels of collegiate educational contribution were indicated in development of attitudes and values, with the lowest being exercising public responsibility and advancing appreciation of the arts. Differences in response between gender and ethnic categories found to be significant at the p = 0.001 level are reported for each question.
In the area of intellectual growth, 93.9% of respondents felt
that NC State at least adequately met their needs. Responses
were found to be significantly different by gender (p = 0.0002),
with 96.7% of female respondents reporting intellectual growth
needs met at least adequately and 91.9% of male respondents reporting
intellectual growth needs met at least adequately. See Table
46.
Intellectual growth needs met (%) | ||||||
Poorly | ||||||
Somewhat Adequately | ||||||
Adequately | ||||||
Very Well |
Respondents were also positive in the area of career training,
with 71.2% reporting that NC State was at least adequate in meeting
their career training growth needs.
Career training growth needs met (%) | ||||||
Poorly | ||||||
Somewhat Adequately | ||||||
Adequately | ||||||
Very Well |
NC State was seen as at least adequately meeting personal growth needs by 83.9% of all respondents. 87.6% of female respondents reported that their personal growth needs were at least adequately met, which was significantly higher (p = 0.0001) than the comparable male response of 81.2%. These results are displayed in Table 48.
Personal growth needs met (%) | ||||||
Poorly | ||||||
Somewhat Adequately | ||||||
Adequately | ||||||
Very Well |
Most graduating seniors indicated that their coursework at NC
State taught them how to find and access needed information, with
88.6% of respondents reporting agreement with this statement.
Coursework taught how to find information (%) |
| |||||
Disagree | ||||||
Tend to Disagree | ||||||
Neither A/D | ||||||
Tend to Agree | ||||||
Agree |
Seniors also reported that their coursework at NC State has increased
their ability to develop creative solutions in the process of
problem solving, with 88.9% of respondents indicating agreement
with this statement. See Table 50.
Coursework increased ability to solve problems (%) |
| |||||
Disagree | ||||||
Tend to Disagree | ||||||
Neither A/D | ||||||
Tend to Agree | ||||||
Agree |
Approximately three fourths of respondents reported making new
friends with people from different countries or different cultural
backgrounds while at NC State, with 75.8% indicating agreement
with this statement.
Made diverse friends (%) | ||||||
Disagree | ||||||
Tend to Disagree | ||||||
Neither A/D | ||||||
Tend to Agree | ||||||
Agree |
Of the 550 respondents who reported taking foreign language classes
at NC State almost two thirds (63.0%) stated that those classes
were helpful in gaining appreciation of other cultures (Table
52).
Foreign language course helped cultural appreciation (%) |
| |||||
Disagree | ||||||
Tend to Disagree | ||||||
Neither A/D | ||||||
Tend to Agree | ||||||
Agree |
In the first of two literacy measures, most graduating seniors
reported some interest in current events, with 88.2% of respondents
indicating that they read newspapers or news magazines at least
three times a month. See Table 53.
How often read news (%) | ||||||
More than 3 times/week | ||||||
1 - 3 times/week | ||||||
3 times/month | ||||||
Less than once a month | ||||||
Seldom | ||||||
Not at all |
In the second of two literacy measures, respondents indicated
that leisure reading was less common than reading for current
events knowledge, with only 64.1% of respondents reporting doing
leisure reading more than three times a month. This result is
displayed in Table 54.
How often read for leisure (%) | ||||||
More than 3 times/week | ||||||
1 - 3 times/week | ||||||
3 times/month | ||||||
Less than once a month | ||||||
Seldom | ||||||
Not at all |
Most graduating seniors felt that their university education had an effect on the development of their writing skills, with 85.1% of respondents indicating that NC State had made at least somewhat of a contribution.
Writing skills (%) | ||||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
Speaking skills was another area respondents felt was influenced
by their university education, with 85.1% stating that their education
had contributed either somewhat or very much to the development
of these skills. See Table 56.
Speaking skills (%) | ||||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
The majority of respondents felt their comprehension skills had
been developed through their experience at NC State, with 88.4%
reporting at least somewhat of a contribution. This result is
displayed in Table 57.
Comprehension skills (%) | ||||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
The percentage of graduating seniors who perceived an educational
contribution through the NC State experience to their usage of
mathematics skills was similarly high, with 86.8% reporting at
least somewhat of a contribution from their NC State education.
There was a significant difference in response by gender (p =
0.0001), with 89.8% of male respondents indicating at least somewhat
of a contribution, and only 82.6% of female respondents indicating
at least somewhat of a contribution. See Table 58.
Using mathematics skills (%) | ||||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
NC State was also seen as having made a definite contribution
to applying scientific methods of inquiry, with 88.8% of respondents
reporting at least somewhat of a contribution. Responses were
found to be significantly different by gender, with 90.1% of men
indicating somewhat to very much of a contribution from their
education, and only 86.8% of women indicating somewhat to very
much of an educational contribution (see Table 59).
Applying scientific methods of inquiry (%) |
| |||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
As displayed in Table 60, the strongest area of educational contribution
to skills development was seen in the area of enhancing analytic
skills. A great majority of respondents (94.6%) stated that
their education at NC State made at least somewhat of a contribution
to the development of these skills.
Enhancing analytic skills (%) | ||||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
When asked about the contribution of their university education to the development of computer skills, 84.9% of respondents replied that they felt NC State had made at least somewhat of a contribution to the development of these skills.
Developing computer skills (%) |
||||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
NC State was seen as having at least somewhat of a contribution to developing a tolerance for divergent views by 78.4% of respondents. Significant differences in response were observed by gender (p = 0.0003), with 81.2% of female respondents indicating somewhat to very much of a contribution vs. 76.4% of male respondents with the same response.
Developing a tolerance for divergent views (%) |
| |||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
The extent to which NC State contributed to respondents' understanding
of diverse cultures and values is presented in Table 63. More
than two thirds of all respondents (69.5%) reported at least somewhat
of an educational contribution to their understanding of diverse
cultures and values. Significant differences were observed by
gender (p = 0.0001), with 75.3% of female respondents seeing somewhat
to very much of a contribution and only 65.3% of male respondents
seeing somewhat to very much of a contribution. These results
are shown in Table 63.
Understanding diverse cultures and values (%) |
| |||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
Graduating seniors' ratings of how much their university education contributed to their appreciation of racial and sexual equality are presented in Table 66. 64.6% of all respondents reported that their education at NC State had at least somewhat of a positive effect in this area. Responses were found to be significantly different by gender (p = 0.0001), with 71.5% of female respondents indicating at least somewhat of an educational contribution, while only 59.6% of male respondents reported perceiving the same level of educational contribution.
Appreciating racial and sexual equality (%) |
| |||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
When rating the extent to which their ability to work with people from diverse backgrounds 84.4% of graduating seniors reported that their university education had influenced their ability in this area at least somewhat.
Ability - work with diverse backgrounds (%) |
| |||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
In the area of recognizing and acting upon ethical principles,
72.4% of all respondents indicated that their education at NC
State had contributed to this ability in the range between somewhat
and very much.
Recognize/act upon ethical principles (%) |
| |||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
In the related area of exercising public responsibility and community
service, graduating seniors indicated that their ability in this
area had been developed through their educational experiences
at NC State, with 62.2% of all respondents reporting at least
somewhat of an educational contribution. Female responses were
significantly different that male responses (p = 0.001), with
65.6% of women and 59.7% of men stating at least somewhat of a
contribution from their university education in this area of development.
Exercising public responsibility /community service (%) |
| |||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
Slightly less than half of graduating seniors indicated that
their university education was important in advancing their appreciation
of the arts, with 49.8% reporting at least somewhat of an educational
contribution to their development in this area. Male responses
were found to be significantly lower than female responses (p
= 0.0001), with 44.1% of men reporting at least somewhat of an
educational contribution and 57.5% of women reporting at least
somewhat of an educational contribution.
Advancing your appreciation of the arts (%) |
| |||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
When asked to evaluate the amount that their college education
had contributed to their understanding of issues and problems
facing the world, 68.1% of graduating seniors reported that their
education had made at least somewhat of a contribution in this
area. Responses were found to be significantly different by gender
(p = 0.0001), with 73.1% of female respondents indicating at least
somewhat of a contribution in this area, while only 64.6% of male
respondents felt the same level of educational contribution.
Understanding issues/problems facing the world (%) |
| |||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
Percentages for educational contribution to understanding the present as it relates to history are given in Table 70. 64.9% of all respondents stated that their understanding of the present as it relates to history had been at least somewhat influenced by their education at NC State.
Understanding the present as relates to history (%) |
| |||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
In the area of understanding how science and technology influence
life, most respondents (87.3%) reported that they felt the contribution
from their university education ranged from somewhat to very much.
This result is displayed in Table 71.
Understanding how science & technology influence life (%) | ||||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
Another strong area of educational contribution was seen as coming in the ability to critically analyze ideas and information, with 93.0% of respondents indicated at least somewhat of a contribution from their NC State education in this area. See Table 72.
Ability to critically analyze ideas/information (%) |
| |||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
The ability to lead or guide others was seen as having been at
least somewhat developed through the NC State experience by 84.1%
of all respondents.
Ability to lead or guide others (%) | ||||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
As displayed in Table 74, most respondents (91.8%) reported that
NC State had made at least somewhat of a contribution to the development
of their ability to function as part of a team.
Ability to function as part of a team (%) |
| |||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
The majority of graduating seniors felt that their ability to
carry out projects independently was developed at least in part
by their education at NC State, with 93.4% stating at least somewhat
of an educational contribution.
Ability to plan/carry out projects independently (%) |
| |||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
When asked about the extent to which their university education had contributed to their appreciation of learning as a lifelong process, 87.7% of graduating seniors felt that the NC State experience had made at least somewhat of a contribution in this area. Significant differences were observed by gender (p = 0.0005), with 89.6% of female respondents reporting at least somewhat of a contribution and 86.4% of male respondents reporting at least somewhat of a contribution.
Appreciating learning as a lifelong process (%) |
| |||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
Commitment to personal health and fitness was seen as being at
least somewhat influenced by their education at NC State by 70.9%
of all respondents.
Commitment to personal health and fitness (%) |
| |||||
Not at all | ||||||
Very Little | ||||||
Somewhat | ||||||
Very Much |
Means and Standard Deviations
Means and standard deviations for global questions on overall
growth and gains realized through the collegiate experience, ranked
from highest to lowest for the total group, are displayed in Table
78. The scale used was: 4 = very well, 3 = adequately, 2 = somewhat
adequately, and 1 = poorly.
Area of Growth |
|||||||
Intellectual growth needs met | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Personal growth needs met | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Career training needs met | mean: | ||||||
sd: |
Means and standard deviations for areas of personal development, also ranked from highest to lowest for the total group, are presented in Table 79. The scale used was: 5 = agree, 4 = tend to agree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 2 = tend to disagree, and 1 = disagree. The means for these questions were calculated with "no opinion" responses omitted.
Area of Personal Development | |||||||
Coursework taught how to find information | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Coursework increased ability to solve problems | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Made diverse friends | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Foreign lang. course helped cultural appreciation | mean: | ||||||
sd: |
The ranked means and standard deviations for respondent estimates of gains in knowledge, skills, and personal development are given in Table 80. The scale used was: 4 = very much, 3 = somewhat, 2 = very little, and 1 = not at all. Quite notable is that all seven of the lowest-ranked items are concerned with diversity/globalization issues or with those outcomes traditionally associated with a liberal arts education.
Area of Academic Development/Goal | |||||||
Enhancing analytic skills | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Ability to plan/carry out projects independently | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Ability to function as part of a team | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Ability to critically analyze ideas/information | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Applying scientific methods of inquiry | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Appreciation. learning as a lifelong process | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Using mathematics skills | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Developing computer skills | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Understand how science/tech. influence life | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Comprehension skills | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Speaking skills | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Writing skills | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Ability to lead or guide others | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Ability to work with diverse backgrounds | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Developing a tolerance for divergent views | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Commitment to personal health & fitness | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Recognize/act upon ethical principles | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Understanding diverse cultures & values | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Understanding issues/problems facing the world | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Appreciating racial & sexual equality | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Understanding present as relates to history | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Exercising public responsibility/community svc. | mean: | ||||||
sd: | |||||||
Advancing your appreciation of the arts | mean: | ||||||
sd: |
Percentage rankings of respondents who reported at least somewhat
of a contribution from their NC State education to knowledge and
skills development are displayed in Chart 3. Important to note
is that these percentages were calculated excluding "don't
know" responses.
Percentage rankings of respondents who reported at least somewhat
of a contribution from their NC State education to development
of attitudes and values are presented in Chart 4. These percentages
were also calculated excluding "don't know" responses.
Interesting to note is how much lower the perceived contribution
to attitudes and values was overall than the perceived contribution
to knowledge and skills development (see Chart 3).
Percentage rankings of respondents who reported at least somewhat
of a contribution from their NC State education to the realization
of educational goals are presented in Chart 4. Again, these percentages
were calculated excluding "don't know" responses. The
area in which graduating seniors reported the highest educational
contribution was ability to plan/carry out projects independently,
with 93.4% reporting at least somewhat of a contribution. The
lowest reported area of educational contribution was understanding
the present as relates to history, with 64.9% of respondents
indicating at least somewhat of a contribution in this area.
Return to Table of Contents
Return to OIRP Survey Page
Back to Top
TIME TO DEGREE COMPLETION
This section presents responses to the question of time spent to acquire a degree at NC State and, if applicable, reasons for taking more than 8 semesters to obtain the degree.
The majority of graduating seniors spent their entire college
career at NC State, with 74.6% of respondents reporting freshman
entry and 25.4% reporting transfer entry.
Enter as freshman or transfer (%) |
| |||||
Freshman | ||||||
Transfer |
Close to half (43.6%) of all seniors reported taking more than
eight semesters to graduate. See Table 81.
More than 8 semesters to complete (%) |
| |||||
Yes | ||||||
No/missing |
Of the 473 respondents who indicated taking more than eight semesters
to complete their degree program, 389 listed a primary reason
for this occurrence. The most frequently cited responses, as
displayed in Table 82, were as follows: 21.1% reported changing
their major field of study; 14.1% reported that their program
included an internship, practicum, etc.; 14.1% reported that it
was due to having a double major, second major, or co-major, and
13.1% reported that it was due to having to work while enrolled
in school.
Primary reason took more than 8 semesters. (%) | ||||||
Changed major | ||||||
Program included an internship etc. | ||||||
Double major/2nd major/co-major | ||||||
Had to wrk while enrolled in school | ||||||
Repeat course to improve grades | ||||||
Program took >4 years to complete | ||||||
Hrs required in major above average | ||||||
Took fewer hrs/sem. to impr. GPA | ||||||
Other personal reasons | ||||||
Poor academic advising | ||||||
Unable to handle heavier acad. load | ||||||
Could not meet GPA req. for major | ||||||
Lost credits from transfer institution | ||||||
Stopped out compl. to earn money | ||||||
Courses needed not always available | ||||||
Family responsibilities | ||||||
Academic suspension |
Return to Table of Contents
Return to OIRP Survey Page
PLANS AFTER GRADUATION
This section presents responses dealing with respondents' plans following graduation. This includes employment status, number of graduate programs to which respondents had applied, number of graduate programs into which they had been accepted, and what (if any) graduate or professional programs they plan on attending.
Most respondents were planning on embarking on a career, with
23.2% indicating that they had already accepted a position, 5.5%
indicating continuation in a current position, and 35.8% indicating
that they were still seeking employment. Only 20.5% of respondents
reported planning to go on to graduate or professional school
either full-time or part-time. These results are displayed in
Table 83.
Plans following graduation (%) | ||||||
Still seeking employment | ||||||
Accepted position after graduation | ||||||
Graduate/prof. school full-time | ||||||
Don't know yet | ||||||
Continuing in current position | ||||||
Not seeking empl./not plan school | ||||||
G/P school/work part-time | ||||||
Entering military service | ||||||
Other |
Of those graduating seniors who reported applying to graduate or professional school (n = 279), 80.7% indicated having applied to between one and four graduate programs. These results are presented in Table 84. The percentage of students who answered "not applicable: have not applied" is presented in Table 84A.
Number of graduate schools to which applied (%) | ||||||
1-2 | ||||||
3-4 | ||||||
> 5 |
Number of graduate schools to which applied (%) | ||||||
Not applicable: Have not applied |
Of those respondents who reported knowledge of acceptance into
graduate or professional programs (n = 193), 94.1% indicated being
accepted at between one and four programs. These percentages
are presented in Table 85. The percentage of respondents who
had no answer for this question or did not know their acceptance
status is displayed in Table 85A.
Number of graduate schools to which accepted (%) | ||||||
1-2 | ||||||
3-4 | ||||||
> 5 |
Number of graduate schools to which accepted (%) | ||||||
No answer/Don't know |
Of those respondents reporting what type of graduate program they planned on attending (n = 222), the highest percentages were reported in the following distinct fields: 25.1% Engineering; 12.6% Health Professions; and 8.1% Law.
Graduate program attending (%) |
||||||
Engineering | ||||||
Other | ||||||
Health professions | ||||||
Law | ||||||
Business and Management | ||||||
Architecture/Envir. Design | ||||||
Physical or Mathematical Sciences | ||||||
Biological Sciences | ||||||
Agriculture or Natural Resources | ||||||
Education | ||||||
Social Sciences | ||||||
Humanities | ||||||
Communications | ||||||
Veterinary Medicine | ||||||
Textiles | ||||||
Computer/Information Sciences | ||||||
Public Affairs/Services |
Return to Table of Contents
Return to OIRP Survey Page
Back to Top
EMPLOYMENT AND INTERNSHIPS AT NC STATE
Information relating to work during the academic year while at NC State is presented in this section. Included are such areas of interest as time spent working during the academic year, relationship between job as a student and major field of study, and participation in the Co-Op program.
Notably, 812 (74.2%) of all respondents reported working during the school year. Of those graduating seniors who reported working during the school year, the majority (91.8%) indicated working less than forty hours per week. Significant differences were observed between those respondents who entered the University as freshmen and those who entered as transfers (p = 0.001), with 16.1% of transfer entry respondents reporting working forty or more hours per week and only 5.4% of freshman entry respondents reporting working forty or more hours per week.
Avg. hrs worked/week while at NC State (%) |
| |||||||
40> hours/week | ||||||||
21-39 hours/week | ||||||||
20< hours/week |
More than half of graduating seniors who worked during the school
year reported some connection between their studies and employment,
with 57.0% stating that their job was at least somewhat related
to their major field of study.
NC State job related to major (%) | ||||||
Directly related | ||||||
Somewhat related | ||||||
Not related |
Slightly less than one fifth (17.5%) of respondents reported
involvement in the Cooperative Education program. Significant
differences were observed by gender (p = 0.001), with the 22.2%
male participation rate being more than double the 11.0% female
participation rate.
Participated in Co-Op (%) | ||||||
Yes | ||||||
No |
Of the students who reported participation in the Cooperative
Education program (n = 183), 57.5% stated that the experience
was helpful in securing a position of employment after graduation.
Co-Op experience helped in getting job (%) | ||||||
Yes | ||||||
No | ||||||
Not sure | ||||||
NA; no job yet |
Return to Table of Contents
Return to OIRP Survey Page
Back to Top
POST-GRADUATION EMPLOYMENT
This section reports the nature of respondents' employment following graduation, including information on educational requirements, relationship to degree subject and salary range.
The percentages for relationship of employment to degree subject
are displayed in Table 91. The majority of respondents who reported
having secured a position by graduation were able to find work
related to their major field of study, with 87.1% reporting that
their employment after graduation was at least somewhat related
to their degree from NC State.
Employment related to degree (%) |
| |||||
Directly related | ||||||
Somewhat related | ||||||
Not related |
The majority of respondents who indicated securing employment
after graduation were also able to find full-time work, with 93.6%
reporting either temporary or permanent full- time positions.
Male responses to this question were significantly different
than female responses to this question (p = 0.001), with 96.8%
of employed males reporting full-time positions and 88.1% of employed
females reporting full-time positions.
Employment status (%) | ||||||
Permanent full-time | ||||||
Permanent part-time | ||||||
Temporary full-time | ||||||
Temporary part-time |
A Bachelor of Arts/Bachelor of Science degree was listed as the
minimum educational requirement for post-graduation employment
by 84.1% of all employed respondents (n = 383). Although the
educational requirements reported by females and African Americans
were somewhat lower than the overall response, no significant
differences were found by race or gender.
Minimum education requirements for position (%) |
| |||||
Bachelor Degree | ||||||
Associate/two years of college | ||||||
Certificate/one year of college | ||||||
High School Diploma or less |
The percentages of employed respondents making salaries within
the listed ranges are shown in Table 94. The salary range reported
most frequently was $35,000-$39,999, with a 26.6% response, followed
by $20,000-$24,999, with a 17.9% response. While differences were
not found to be significant by race or gender, it should be noted
that the highest response levels for both females and African
Americans were in the $24,999 and under range.
Yearly salary (%) | ||||||
Under $20,000 | ||||||
$20,000-$24,999 | ||||||
$25,000-$29,999 | ||||||
$30,000-$34,999 | ||||||
$35,000-$39,999 | ||||||
$40,000-$44,999 | ||||||
$45,000 or over |
Return to Table of Contents
Return to OIRP Survey Page
CAMPUS DIVERSITY ISSUES
This section presents a broad-based discussion of survey results
as they pertain to campus diversity. Differences in response
found to be statistically significant at the p = 0.001 level by
respondents' gender or ethnicity are included. Also included
are comparisons that, while not statistically significant, still
provide insight into the circumstances relating to these differences.
Methodology
Three types of statistical analysis were used to determine significance.
For questions with numerically coded answers, t-tests were used
to determine differences by gender, and analysis of variance with
the Duncan multiple comparison procedure used to determine differences
by ethnicity. Chi-Square tests were used for the categorical
(non-numeric) variables, and were interpreted in the following
manner: The hypothesis of interest is the hypothesis of no association
(independence) between the variables being tested. SAS uses the
marginal totals for each row and column to compute an expected
value for each cell (E(ij) = 1/n*[row total(i)*column
total(j)] ). The expected value is defined as the
number of occurrences that would be observed in the cell if the
two variables were independent of each other. Large deviations
between the actual number of occurrences and the expected number
of occurrences causes statistical significance. In tests which
are not significant, large differences between observed and expected
values can still be looked at to determine areas where gender
and ethnicity have relatively strong association with survey questions.
Ethnicity Issues:
Significant differences in response by ethnicity at the p = 0.001 level were first found in the section profiling respondents' perceptions of campus climate for various subpopulations of students at NC State:
Only one other significant difference at the p = 0.001 level
was observed by ethnicity. In response to the question of choosing
to attend NC State again (question 30), 89.3% of white respondents
indicated that they would choose NC State again; 79.0% of respondents
from other ethnic minorities indicated that they would choose
NC State again; and a much lower 70.7% of African American respondents
indicated that they would choose NC State again. The difference
in response to this question between white and African American
respondents is 18.5%, and while this is a considerable difference
there are no specific indicators pointing to the cause of this
difference.
No significant differences were found by ethnicity in the area of personal characteristics (question 14), but an interesting pattern emerged in the responses for current level of development vs. educational contribution to current level of development:
None of the questions dealing with employment (both while attending NC State and after graduation) had significant differences in response by ethnicity, but African American responses to these questions show that there are still differences in the opportunities available to members of minority groups:
Thus, in relation to the other ethnic subgroups, African American
respondents perceived a more discriminatory climate at NC State
towards their group, perceived a lesser contribution to their
personal development from NC State, were more likely to have worked
and to have worked longer hours during the academic year, were
less likely to have worked in a position related to their academic
major during the academic year, and were least likely of the
three ethnic subgroups to have secured a position of employment
following graduation that was related to their academic major.
Despite these findings, the great majority (70.7%) of African
American respondents would choose NC State again.
Gender Issues:
The first area of significant difference by gender was found in responses to question 3 (primary goal or objective for attending NC State) and question 18 (plans following graduation):
These results are supported by the answers to question 18 (plans
following graduation), where more women than expected reported
plans to attend graduate or professional school after graduation
and more men then expected have already accepted positions of
employment. Tests of question 3 and question 18 against gender
were both significant at the p = 0.001 significance level.
Another highly significant difference (p = 0.001) was observed between the male and female participation rates in the Cooperative Education program:
This finding points to a need for further research to determine
why female participation in Cooperative Education is noticeably
lower than male participation (e.g. is there any gender bias inherent
in the opportunities available to students?).
In the area of student satisfaction, significant differences occurred in 7 items, with females reporting a higher satisfaction rating in 6 out of the 7 items:
In general, female respondents reported less of an educational contribution from NC State in the area of technical skills training, but reported a significantly higher educational contribution to personal growth, the development of personal characteristics, and development of attitudes and values than did male respondents. The following differences were significant:
Employment after graduation was another area where obvious differences (significant and otherwise) were found. Whether graduating students had accepted full-time employment or part-time employment was found to be significant by gender (p = 0.001).
The following information on employment was not found to be statistically significant, but none the less paints an interesting picture of the reported differences in employment opportunities available to male and female graduating senior survey respondents.
Thus, in relation to males, female respondents reported lower
participation in cooperative educational programs, lower perceived
growth in self-confidence and ability to handle stress (two critical
attributes in preparing to enter the workforce), higher rates
of part-time work following graduation, a lesser likelihood of
gaining employment related to the academic major, a substantially
lower average salary, and lower minimum educational requirement
for jobs currently held or to be assumed following graduation.
Return to Table of Contents
Return to OIRP Survey Page
Back to Top
EMERGING ISSUES
This section of the report is intended to act as a focal point
for the emergence of students' voices through their open-ended
comments on the graduating senior survey. While fully 94 pages
of commentary were received from this survey, a full qualitative
analysis of the data would be well beyond the scope of this report.
Rather, frequently-mentioned themes are presented in summarized
form.
Environment for Learning
A repeated topic for student commentary was the quality of the environment for learning at NC State: the appearance of the campus, the condition of the dormitories and buildings, the cleanliness of the campus, and the condition of the labs.
Thirteen comments were received concerning the general appearance of the campus, all uncomplimentary. Landscaping was frequently mentioned. Two comments offer particular insight into this theme. One student reported "One of my major complaints at State is with the landscaping. As a former tour guide, I've been asked questions about why our campus is so drab -- I've never been able to give an impressive answer for that one. I mean, why doesn't the Physical Plant plant some flowers, bushes, and grass? Instead, students and visitors get to look at bunches of smelly mulch between sidewalks. Our landscape I'm sure hurts in the recruiting process." Another student commented "I think something needs to be done to make [the] campus look better. At other universities I have visited, students take pride in the beauty of their school."
Eight comments were received regarding the general repair and cleanliness of dormitories and older buildings. Among dorm residents finding fault with the housekeeping staff, one student's comment stood out: "I have lived in the dorms all four years and each year the cleaning staff has gotten worse. Instead of cleaning they just hose everything down. I would rather the school provide the cleaning supplies for the students so they can clean the bathrooms instead of wasting our money on [expletive deleted] housekeepers." Other comments in this vein spoke to the need to keep the older buildings much cleaner and to perform needed renovations on both older buildings and dormitories. The need for computer facilities in dormitories was also mentioned by several respondents. One respondent felt cheated as regards computers in dormitories: "I paid extra money to live in Watauga this past year because they were supposed to have in-house computing facilities that were not there."
Eleven respondents called for expanded and updated computer lab
facilities, and 24-hour availability for extant computer labs.
Two respondents asked for security systems to be installed to
make 24-hour access a possibility. Eight other respondents expressed
a desire for updated and renovated undergraduate lab facilities,
and nine comments on the inadequacy of classroom facilities were
received.
Choice of Major
Another prevalent theme in open-ended comments was the request
that students be given more time before having to choose a major
and more information on the majors available. Respondents expressed
concern that students who change majors are automatically behind
as far as on-time graduation. Many felt that the choice of major
should be postponed until the sophomore year, with the freshman
year being devoted to general education courses. The following
quote was fairly typical: "The most important suggestion
I have is to allow undergraduates more time to choose a major.
Most high school graduates do not know exactly what they want
to do when they graduate. There is a stigma attached to University
Undesignated. I didn't really know what Biochemistry was when
I chose it. I was lucky I liked it. Also, there should be more
honesty about the job markets for the majors. I didn't find out
until my Junior year that the market is currently saturated."
Return to Table of Contents
Return to OIRP Survey Page
The following summary is organized to reflect the contextual
relevancy of the findings to NC State's recently adopted strategic
plan. Therefore, goals of that plan to which findings of the
survey are relevant appear as headers to the findings in various
areas.
Strategic Plan Goal #1: NC State will improve success and
satisfaction of undergraduate and graduate students, staff, and
faculty.
Student Satisfaction with Academic Experiences
Respondents reported differential rates of satisfaction with many aspects of the NC State educational experience, as follows:
Student Satisfaction with Activities and Services
Respondents rated their satisfaction with the quality of NC State student services and campus related activities. At least two thirds of all graduating seniors reported at least moderate satisfaction with all services and activities, with the exception of financial aid services and food service on campus.
Outcomes of General Education
Respondents reported that NC State contributed highly through the collegiate experience in areas of technical skills development such as enhancing analytic skills. Lower levels of collegiate educational contribution were seen in development of attitudes and values, with the lowest being advancing appreciation of the arts.
Student Goal Achievement
Student Personal Development
Most respondents reported high or very high current developmental levels on personal characteristics, but reported a relatively lower rating for the educational contribution through the NC State experience to their current developmental level on personal characteristics.
Time to Degree Completion
Most respondents reported entering NC State as freshmen, and more than half of all respondents (56.4%) indicated that they were able to obtain their degree in 8 semesters.
Plans After Graduation
The majority (85.0%) of all respondents reported that, as of April, 1995, they were either already employed, still looking for employment, or were planning on continuing their education at the graduate level.
Employment/Internships while at NC State
Almost three-quarters (74.2%) of all respondents indicated that they had worked during the academic year at NC State.
Employment Following Graduation
The majority of respondents who reported having accepted a position were able to find full-time work, and in most cases reported a close connection between the major in which they graduated and their employment following graduation.
Environment for Learning
A number of respondents commented on the relative aesthetic quality of the NC State campus, the cleanliness of campus buildings, the quality of facilities, and the upkeep of older buildings.
Personal Safety
Relatively low ratings were indicated by respondents for personal safety on campus; numerous comments were received on this issue, especially from female respondents.
Choice of Major
A prevalent theme in open-ended comments was the request that students be given more time before having to choose a major and more information on the majors available.
Strategic Plan Goal #6: NC State will expand multicultural
and global awareness among the members of the university community,
in its curricula, and through international partnerships.
Strategic Plan Goal #7: NC State will achieve a diverse
student body, faculty and staff that better reflect contemporary
society.
Campus Climate
The campus climate was generally seen as being supportive towards diverse subgroups of students, but significant differences were observed by gender in the perception of campus climate for men and by ethnicity in perception of campus climate for African Americans.
Campus Diversity Issues
Many significant differences in response were found by race and gender in the sections for Campus Climate, Student Goal Achievement, Student Personal Development, Plans After Graduation, and Employment and Internships while at NC State.
Return to Table of Contents
Return to OIRP Survey Page
Return to OIRP Home Page