[- NC State University -]

1999 Graduating Senior Survey Data Tables:
Gender and Racial/Ethnic Comparisons
in Academic Environment and Faculty Contributions

 
This document reports survey data on gender and racial/ethnic differences in the respondents' overall assessment of the academic environment at NC State, and their ratings of faculty contributions to their educational experience here. Survey results for all respondents are provided in "1999 Graduating Senior Survey: All Respondents." For information about the survey and analysis methods, see " 1999 Graduating Senior Survey: Introduction, Methods, and Student Demographic Profile."

Satisfaction | Intellectual Environment | Quality of Instruction | Faculty Contributions



Choose NC State again?

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Yes

74.4%

75.1%

73.9%

57.1%

75.8%

71.2%

No

9.0%

7.9%

9.8%

10.7%

8.8%

10.2%

Not Sure

16.6%

17.0%

16.3%

32.1%

15.4%

18.6%

Survey item #31: Satisfaction with Education (exact wording)
Back to top

Choose same major again?

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Yes

68.4%

65.9%

70.3%

71.4%

68.6%

62.7%

No

11.5%

12.3%

10.9%

16.1%

10.7%

18.6%

Not Sure

20.1%

21.7%

18.8%

12.5%

20.7%

18.6%

Survey item #31: Satisfaction with Education (exact wording)
Back to top



Intellectual environment on campus

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Very strong

15.5%

19.4%

12.4%

16.1%

15.3%

16.9%

Strong

57.5%

57.7%

57.4%

60.7%

58.3%

44.1%

Average

23.4%

19.1%

26.7%

23.2%

22.7%

33.9%

Weak

3.0%

3.3%

2.6%

0.0%

3.1%

3.4%

Very weak

0.6%

0.5%

0.8%

0.0%

0.6%

1.7%

Survey item #28: Intellectual Environment on Campus (exact wording)
Back to top



Quality of instruction - in major

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

50.1%

54.1%

46.9%

51.8%

50.4%

44.1%

Good

42.4%

40.0%

44.3%

42.9%

42.6%

39.0%

Fair

7.1%

6.0%

7.9%

5.4%

6.6%

15.3%

Poor

0.5%

0.0%

0.9%

0.0%

0.5%

1.7%

Survey item #29: Quality of Instruction (exact wording)
Back to top

Quality of instruction - overall

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

14.2%

16.5%

12.3%

12.5%

14.1%

17.2%

Good

70.3%

70.3%

70.4%

73.2%

70.7%

62.1%

Fair

14.6%

12.5%

16.3%

14.3%

14.3%

19.0%

Poor

0.8%

0.7%

0.9%

0.0%

0.8%

1.7%

Survey item #29: Quality of Instruction (exact wording)
Back to top



Evaluate overall edu received at NCSU

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

41.3%

45.8%

37.8%

34.5%

42.0%

37.3%

Good

52.8%

48.7%

56.0%

60.0%

52.4%

50.8%

Fair

5.8%

5.5%

6.1%

5.5%

5.4%

11.9%

Poor

0.1%

0.0%

0.2%

0.0%

0.1%

0.0%

Survey item #30: Evaluation of Overall Education (exact wording)
Back to top



Faculty Contributions

 

Mean Rating
(Based on a scale of 4="Excellent," 3="Good," 2="Fair," and 1="Poor")

 

All

Women

Men

White

AfAm

Other

Set high expectations to learn

3.39

3.45

3.35

3.40

3.45

3.21

Respect diverse talents & ways of learn

3.02

3.10

2.95

3.02

2.95

2.98

Encourage active learning

3.16

3.24

3.10

3.17

3.22

3.07

Encourage student/faculty interaction

3.07

3.15

3.02

3.09

2.91

2.95

Freq and prompt feedback from faculty

3.11

3.17

3.06

3.11

3.09

3.03

Time/energy to coursework encouraged

3.31

3.38

3.25

3.31

3.29

3.20

Opp for coop learning w/ fellow stdnts

3.22

3.22

3.22

3.22

3.31

3.08

Care about academic success/welfare

3.05

3.13

3.00

3.09

2.95

2.72

Overall rating of faculty

3.20

3.26

3.15

3.20

3.17

3.11

Survey items #1-9: Faculty Contributions (exact wording)
View Frequency Distributions for all items (Click on individual question for the frequency distribution of a specific item.)
Back to top



For more information on the 1999 Graduating Senior Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: April 2000

Download a Microsoft Excel Version (Excel 5.0 or higher) of this report.

Return to 1999 Graduating Senior Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page