[- NC State University -]
Graduating Senior Survey:
A Trend Analysis, 1995-1997

Table of Contents

Return to OIRP Survey Page
Return to OIRP Home Page

Office of Institutional Planning and Research, May 1998
Mark Lindblad, Graduate Research Assistant
Denise Gardner, Coordinator of Survey Research


North Carolina State University
Graduating Senior Survey:
A Trend Analysis, 1995-1997
Introduction

This report presents findings from three years of data on NC State's graduating senior survey. The survey was administered to all NC State seniors planning to graduate during the respective spring semesters. Seniors were asked to evaluate their NC State experiences in terms of educational outcomes, satisfaction with services, and campus climate. This report compares responses for similar questions over a three-year period, 1995-1997.

Standard statistical procedures were used to test for significant differences by year. Categorical data was analyzed using chi-square tests, and numerically coded data was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance with Duncan's multiple comparison procedure. Statistical tests were assessed at the .01 probability level. The obtained samples of graduating seniors were similar across years. Chi-square analysis revealed that the samples in each year did not differ significantly from the total population in terms of race or gender, but differences were found by academic unit each year.

The survey underwent revisions each year. A few questions and response options were altered slightly and the location of some questions were moved within the survey from one year to the next; these revisions may have affected the results of the trend analysis. Additionally, while this report analyzed differences by year, the non-significant findings also deserve attention. This report summarizes the major trends and uses tables to display the findings for each year.

Summary of Trends

Profile of Respondents

The profile section provides a depiction of seniors in terms of demographic composition, goals and intentions, employment and co-op experiences, and plans following graduation.

Demographics of the samples

This section compares the demographic composition of the three samples. Respondents are compared in terms of gender, ethnicity, and academic unit.

Gender and Ethnicity of Respondents
Ethnic
1995
1996
1997
Group
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
African- American
30

2.7%
14

1.3%
44

4.0%
42

4.0%
20

1.9%
62

5.9%
30

3.0%
26

2.6%
56

5.6%
Other Ethnic Minorities
19

1.7%
43

3.9%
62

5.6%
11

1.1%
24

2.3%
35

3.4%
28

2.8%
26

2.6%
54

5.4%

White
403

36.9%
584

53.4%
987

90.3%
380

36.6%
562

54.1%
942

90.7%
366

36.6%
523

52.3%
889

88.9%

Total

452

41.4%
641

58.6%
1,093

100.0%
433

41.9%
606

58.1%
1,039

100.0%
424

42.4%
575

57.5%
999

100.0%
Note: These numbers differ slightly from the overall sample size because of missing data on gender and ethnicity.

Academic Unit of Respondents
College or School
1995
1996
1997
Agriculture and Life Sciences
178
16.3%
213
20.4%
229
22.9%
Design
37
3.4%
47
4.5%
42
4.2%
Education and Psychology
62
5.7%
68
6.5%
45
4.5%
Engineering
407
37.2%
307
29.4%
265
26.5%
Forest Resources
65
5.9%
66
6.3%
69
6.9%
Humanities and Social Sciences
153
14.0%
146
14.0%
129
12.9%
Management
104
9.5%
78
7.5%
111
11.1%
Physical and Mathematical Sciences
48
4.4%
60
5.7%
64
6.4%
Textiles
40
3.7%
59
5.7%
45
4.5%
Total
1,094
100.0%
1,044
100.0%
999
100.0%

Goals and intentions

This section displays seniors' primary goal for attending NC State and the extent to which they feel they accomplished their goals. Across years, over three-fourths of respondents felt they had fully accomplished their primary goal for attending NC State.

Respondents were also asked to reconsider their educational choices. If seniors could begin again, would they choose to attend NC State? Would they choose the same major field of study? Across years, nearly 90% of respondents said they would attend NC State again, and nearly 80% said they would choose the same major again.

Primary Goal/Objective for Attending NC State
Primary goal or objective for attending NC State (%)
1995

1996

1997
Bachelor's degree or certificate only
13.6

18.2

19.5
Bachelor's degree as preparation for school
28.0

29.9

31.2
Bachelor's degree as preparation for career
55.2

49.4

46.2
Improve knowledge, skills, competencies required for job
2.6

1.4

1.4
Courses for personal interest 0.10.2 0.4
Other0.6 0.91.4
p<.01

Accomplished Primary Goal/Objective
Extent will have accomplished primary goal (%)
1995

1996

1997
Fully accomplished 77.774.2 76.6
Partially accomplished 21.825.2 22.9
Not accomplished0.6 0.60.5

Attend NC State Again
Choose to attend NC State again? (%)
1995
1996
1997
Yes88.0 87.788.2
No12.0 12.311.8

Choose Same Major Again
Choose same major field of study again? (%)
1995

1996

1997
Yes78.4 78.374.4
No21.6 21.725.6

Employment and co-op experiences

This section displays seniors' employment and co-op experiences while attending NC State. For all three samples, roughly 80% of respondents reported being employed while attending NC State. Of these students, over 60% worked part-time and about 40% held jobs that were unrelated to their major. Less than a fifth of all respondents had co-op experiences, but for those who did, over half reported that the co-op helped them obtain employment.

Average Hours Worked Per Week While at NC State
Average hours worked per week while at NC State (%)
1995

1997

1997
21 or more hours/week 37.037.9 37.6
20 or less hours/week 63.162.1 62.4
Note: these percentages are based on those roughly 80% of respondents who indicated they were employed while attending NC State.

School-Year Job Related to Major
School-year job related to major (%)
1995
1996
1997
Directly related 26.4 29.128.9
Somewhat related30.6 29.131.9
Not related43.0 41.839.3

Co-op Participation
Participation in co-op (%)
1995
1996
1997
Yes17.5 16.316.5
No82.5 83.783.5

Value of co-op Experience
Co-op experience helped in getting employment (%)
1995

1996

1997
Yes57.5 52.554.8
No14.4 14.913.4
Not sure8.3 7.816.6
Not applicable; no job yet 19.924.8 15.3
p<.01

Plans after graduation

This section displays seniors' plans following graduation. At the time of survey administration, approximately one-fourth of each year's respondents had accepted positions of employment or were continuing in current positions. The surveys were administered several months prior to graduation and this figure may underestimate actual post-graduate employment levels.

Several trends were apparent. Across the years, for those seniors who knew they had employment as of the time of the survey, over 90% had accepted full-time positions, over 80% had accepted permanent positions, and over 70% had positions that were directly related to their degree.

Plans Following Graduation
Plans following graduation (%)
1995
1996
1997
Don't know yet5.6 6.86.8
Accepted position of employment after graduation 23.217.7 25.3
Continuing in current position 5.54.7 3.4
Graduate/professional school full-time 18.618.5 17.2
Graduate/professional school part-time and working part-time
1.9

2.3

3.1
Still seeking employment 35.838.3 34.6
Not seeking employment and not planning to attend school
2.7

3.8

1.7
Entering military service 1.21.6 1.9
Other5.6 6.36.0
p<.01

Employment Status After Graduation
Employment status after graduation (%)
1995

1996

1997
Full-time 93.6 94.295.3
Part-time6.4 5.84.7
Note: these percentages are based on those respondents who knew they had employment as of the time of the survey.

Nature of Employment
Nature of employment (%)
1995
1996
1997
Permanent86.2 79.681.5
Temporary13.8 20.418.5
Note: these percentages are based on those respondents who knew they had employment as of the time of the survey.

Minimum Educational Requirements for Position
Minimum educational requirements for position (%)
1995

1996

1997
Bachelor Degree84.1 84.885.8
Associate/two years of college 3.47.3 6.5
Certificate/one year of college 1.60.7 1.5
High School Diploma or less 11.07.3 6.2
Note: these percentages are based on those respondents who knew they had employment as of the time of the survey.

Relationship of Employment to Degree
Relationship of employment to degree (%)
1995

1996

1997
Directly related 69.4 66.667.1
Somewhat related17.7 25.122.6
Not related12.9 8.410.3
Note: these percentages are based on those respondents who knew they had employment as of the time of the survey.

Salary Range
Salary range (%)
1995
1996
1997
Under $20,00015.8 13.510.4
$20,000-$24,99917.9 14.215.4
$25,000-$29,99912.0 15.712.1
$30,000-$34,99914.9 14.916.9
$35,000-$39,99926.6 21.020.4
$40,000-$44,99910.3 17.115.4
$45,000 or over2.4 3.69.5
p<.01
Note: these percentages are based on those respondents who knew they had employment as of the time of the survey.

Campus Climate

For the campus climate section, only a few items were available across all three years. The following table lists responses to the question "How would you assess the campus climate for the following groups of students?" Seniors were asked to respond to this question on a five-point scale ranging from strongly discriminatory to strongly supportive. Campus climate was rated as the most supportive for women and men, and the least supportive for disabled students and gay/lesbian students. Except for a 1996 drop in the score for African-Americans, the groups were stable across years.

Campus Climate For Students
Campus climate (% mild to strong support)
1995
1996
1997
Women76.2 72.975.5
Men72.6 69.974.7
African-Americans* 70.866.0 70.3
Other ethnic minorities 58.455.2 59.8
International students 61.660.6 61.8
Disabled students55.9 53.654.0
Gay and lesbian students 26.227.7 26.8
* p<.01

Satisfaction with Services

Seniors were asked to rate the quality of a number of general academic areas, academic advising and their advisor, and student services. For each of these areas, students were asked "How satisfied were you with the quality of each of the following?" Satisfaction was measured using a four-point scale ranging from "very dissatisfied" to "very satisfied." Another option ("don't know/did not use") allowed students to indicate if they did not use the service. The tables display the percent of respondents who rated the area and indicated that they were moderately or very satisfied.

Academic Areas

This section shows seniors' satisfaction with academic areas such as curriculum and instruction. The table displays the percent of respondents indicating that they were moderately or very satisfied. For all three years, the item receiving the highest rating was instruction in major. The greatest change over the three year period was demonstrated by library services, which increased from 80% satisfaction in 1995 to 91% satisfaction in 1997.

Satisfaction With the Quality of NC State Academic Areas
Satisfaction with the quality of NC State academic areas (% moderately to very satisfied)
1995

1996

1997
Instruction in major 94.394.0 91.7
Overall instruction 94.193.6 92.7
Diversity of courses in major 86.685.1 85.5
Diversity of courses overall 90.191.6 90.3
Availability of courses in major 79.383.5 81.0
Availability of courses overall 87.188.3 84.3
Adequacy of classroom facilities 79.578.9 75.4
Adequacy of laboratory facilities 74.578.5 76.8
Opportunity for interaction with faculty 77.778.5 78.0
Academic support services 82.386.6 85.0
Library services*80.0 85.191.4
Computer lab/center services* 78.884.7 83.9
Internships, co-ops, etc. 83.784.7 84.7
* p<.01

Academic Advising

This section displays seniors' assessment of their academic advising experiences at NC State. More detailed academic advising questions were asked in 1995 and 1996. Across years the highest satisfaction was for required academic planning and the lowest was for career advising. The global advising measure indicates that nearly 70% of students in each of the three years were moderately to very satisfied with their academic advising experience.

Academic Advising
Advisor's abilities (% moderately to very satisfied)
1995

1996

1997
Required academic planning --81.9 81.2
Advice/discussion of academic matters --70.8 69.2
Career advising-- 64.563.8
Career advising-- 79.876.1
Academic advising68.0 68.369.3

Student Services

This section displays satisfaction ratings for numerous services offered to students at NC State. The ratings on five services changed significantly across years. Of these significant differences, two were substantively large: both financial aid services and personal safety on campus increased almost eight percentage points over the three-year period.

Satisfaction With the Quality of NC State Student Services
Satisfaction with the quality of NC State student services (% moderately to very satisfied)
1995

1996

1997
Opportunity to participate in co-curricular activities
84.3

91.1

86.9
Opportunity to join campus clubs* 93.793.6 92.5
Services for commuter students 66.469.3 64.0
Personal safety on campus* 72.884.2 80.7
Career services/employment 68.776.4 --
Financial aid services* 60.864.4 68.4
Bookstore services and products 77.277.1 74.2
Registration process 88.585.3 --
Residence halls71.8 72.564.6
Food service on campus 56.955.6 58.1
Campus-sponsored recreation* 89.487.1 87.9
Health services81.3 81.680.0
Business office/cashier 82.383.2 79.8
Counseling center80.0 81.281.6
Chaplains' Cooperative Ministry --86.5 92.2
Registration and Records* 87.688.0 89.0
* p<.01

Knowledge, Skills, and Personal Development

The remainder of this report discusses educational outcomes at NC State. The final section involves general educational outcomes, while this section discusses seniors' assessment of their knowledge, skills, and personal development. Graduating seniors were asked to rate the extent to which NC State had contributed to their development using a four-point scale ranging from "not at all" to "very much." A "don't know" response was also provided, but less than 4% of respondents used that option on any one item. Respondents marking "don't know" were removed from the analysis for that item.

The knowledge, skills, and personal development items were categorized into three domains: technical skills, established goals for undergraduate education, and attitudes and values. In general, seniors provided the highest ratings for NC State's contribution to technical skills and established goals for undergraduate education.

Technical Skills

The table below shows the contribution of NC State to the development of seven technical skills areas. Each year, the item receiving the highest rating was enhancing analytic skills. Two statistically significant differences emerged across the three years. Ratings on the use of mathematical skills decreased 3.7 percent from 1995 to 1997, yet ratings of computer skill development increased 4.8% across the same time period. In general, ratings on technical skills were high, and over 83% of respondents indicated that NC State contributed moderately or very much to the development of their technical skills.

Contribution of NC State Education to Technical Skills Development
Contribution of NC State education to technical skills development (% moderately to very much)
1995

1996

1997
Writing skills85.1 84.883.9
Speaking skills85.1 84.283.3
Comprehension skills 88.488.1 88.0
Using mathematics skills* 86.884.0 83.1
Applying scientific methods of inquiry 88.887.8 86.1
Enhancing analytic skills 94.693.0 93.4
Developing computer skills* 84.987.2 89.7
* p<.01

Established Goals for Undergraduate Education

Seniors also rated NC State's contribution to areas that have been established by the University as goals for undergraduate education. The highest rated items are ability to critically analyze ideas and information, ability to function as part of a team, and ability to plan and carry out projects independently. Seniors rated NC State's contribution lowest on understanding the present as it relates to history, and commitment to personal health and fitness. There were no statistically significant changes across years.

Contribution of NC State Education to Established Goals for Undergraduate Education
Contribution of NC State education to established goals for undergraduate education (% moderately to very much)

1995


1996


1997
Understanding the present as relates to history 64.967.9 66.8
Understanding how science and technology influence life
87.3

88.2

88.6
Ability to critically analyze ideas and information 93.094.3 92.6
Ability to work with diverse backgrounds 84.483.7 81.3
Ability to lead or guide others 84.185.6 84.7
Ability to function as part of a team 91.890.4 90.0
Ability to plan and carry out projects independently
93.4

94.4

91.7
Appreciating learning as a lifelong process 87.789.1 88.1
Commitment to personal health and fitness 70.969.7 68.7

Attitudes and Values

A third area under knowledge, skills, and personal development was attitudes and values. Across years, seniors rated NC State's contribution highest for developing a tolerance for divergent views. The lowest item across years was advancing your appreciation of the arts. Two of the items differed significantly across years: both exercising public responsibility and community service and appreciating racial and sexual equality decreased in 1996 and then increased in 1997. However, this effect may be due to the fact that more questions relating to these areas were asked in 1996 than in 1995 and 1997. In general, senior's ratings of NC State's contribution to their attitudes and values has been notably lower than that of technical skills and the established goals for undergraduate education.

Contribution of NC State Education to Attitudes and Values
Contribution of NC State education to attitudes and values (% moderately to very much)
1995

1996

1997
Developing a tolerance for divergent views 78.478.3 78.3
Understanding diverse cultures and values 69.570.7 69.2
Recognizing and acting upon ethical principles 72.472.5 72.1
Exercising public responsibility and community service* 62.2 54.1 61.5
Appreciating racial and sexual equality* 64.662.0 63.5
Advancing your appreciation of the arts 49.849.3 48.8
Understanding issues and problems facing the world 68.169.0 69.7
* p<.01

General Education Outcomes

This last section displays respondents' ratings on broad educational measures. Included in this section are coursework impacts, reading indicators, cultural appreciation, and global measures of growth needs.

Information access and creative problem solving

Most respondents indicated that their coursework had positive educational impacts. The large majority each year (over 87%) indicated that their coursework at NC State increased their ability to find information and solve problems creatively. There were no significant differences across years.

Coursework Taught How to Find Information
Coursework taught how to find and access needed information (%)
1995

1996

1997
Disagree 1.1 0.70.1
Tend to Disagree 2.9 2.82.2
Neither A/D 7.5 5.56.1
Tend to Agree 47.0 50.746.8
Agree 41.6 40.444.8

Coursework Increased Ability to Solve Problems
Coursework increased ability to creatively solve problems (%)
1995

1996

1997
Disagree 0.6 0.60.4
Tend to Disagree 2.8 3.13.6
Neither A/D 7.6 7.98.8
Tend to Agree 45.0 42.344.1
Agree 43.9 46.143.0

Reading Indicators

Reading indicators provided another measure of seniors' general education. Respondents were asked to rate how frequently they read newspapers and news magazines as well as more leisurely reading such as novels and literature. Of those seniors reading at least once a month, each year about 85% read the news while roughly 60% read for leisure. Both items differed significantly across years.

How Often Read the News
On average, how often do you read newspapers and news magazines? (%)
1995

1996

1997
More than 3 times per week 35.036.5 36.2
1-3 times per week 36.734.4 34.9
1-3 times per month 16.515.7 16.3
Less than 1 time per month 3.92.9 2.8
Seldom6.1 9.48.8
Not at all1.9 1.17.1
p<.01

How Often Read for Leisure
On average, how often do you read for leisure (for example, novels, literature)? (%)
1995

1996

1997
More than 3 times per week 21.621.4 21.8
1-3 times per week 22.722.9 22.8
1-3 times per month 19.822.7 19.7
Less than 1 time per month 14.710.1 11.2
Seldom17.0 19.320.9
Not at all4.2 3.63.6
p<.01

Cultural appreciation

Two survey questions asked respondents about the impact of NC State on their cultural appreciation. Respondents were first asked if they had made new friends with people from different countries or cultural backgrounds at NC State. Across all three years, over 70% of respondents agreed or tended to agree with this statement. For the smaller number of respondents who had taken foreign language courses (n~500), each year over half indicated that these courses helped them gain an appreciation of other cultures. For both questions, there were no significant differences by year.

Diverse Friends
Made diverse friends while at NC State (%)
1995

1996

1997
Disagree 5.3 4.95.3
Tend to Disagree 6.5 8.68.0
Neither A/D 12.4 13.911.7
Tend to Agree 28.8 28.427.0
Agree 47.0 44.248.1

Foreign Language Course Helped Cultural Appreciation
Foreign language course helped cultural appreciation (%)
1995

1996

1997
Disagree 7.6 6.05.5
Tend to Disagree 6.2 8.99.9
Neither A/D 23.2 26.825.8
Tend to Agree 34.4 32.430.6
Agree 28.6 25.828.2

Global growth indicators

Finally, another general education outcome is provided by indicators of global growth. For the areas of intellectual growth, career training, and personal growth, seniors were asked to rate how well NC State met their needs on a four-point scale ranging from "poorly" to "very well." The highest item across years was intellectual growth, and the lowest item was career training. There were no significant differences by year.

Across all years, about half of respondents said that NC State met their intellectual growth needs very well, and roughly 40% indicated that NC State met their needs adequately. In meeting career training needs, each year over one-fourth of respondents rated NC State as doing very well. On the measure of personal growth, each year over 40% of respondents indicated that NC State did very well in meeting these needs.

Intellectual Growth Needs Met
Intellectual growth needs met (%)
1995

1996

1997
Poorly 0.8 0.30.6
Somewhat Adequately 5.3 5.0 5.8
Adequately 44.1 40.142.3
Very Well 49.8 54.651.3

Career Training Growth Needs Met
Career training growth needs met (%)
1995

1996

1997
Poorly 5.1 5.04.4
Somewhat Adequately 23.7 20.2 22.3
Adequately 45.5 46.945.4
Very Well 25.7 28.027.9

Personal Growth Needs Met
Personal growth needs met (%)
1995

1996

1997
Poorly 2.9 2.52.6
Somewhat Adequately 13.3 10.5 12.1
Adequately 40.2 44.041.0
Very Well 43.6 43.044.3

Return to top