[- NC State University -]

1999 Graduating Senior Survey Data Tables:
Frequency Distributions to Survey Items #1-9
(Faculty Contributions)

 
This document reports the frequency distributions by gender and race/ethnicity of survey items #1-9 of the 1999 Graduating Senior Survey. A table comparing mean ratings is available on the web.

Exact wording of question: Please evaluate how well faculty members in your major department do each of the following.



Set high expectations to learn

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

44.2%

48.3%

41.0%

46.6%

45.1%

29.5%

Good

50.9%

48.1%

53.1%

51.7%

50.0%

62.3%

Fair

4.7%

3.6%

5.6%

1.7%

4.7%

8.2%

Poor

0.2%

0.0%

0.4%

0.0%

0.2%

0.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Respect diverse talents & ways of learn

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

22.9%

26.6%

20.0%

22.4%

22.9%

23.0%

Good

57.6%

57.6%

57.6%

55.2%

58.2%

52.5%

Fair

17.8%

15.1%

20.0%

17.2%

17.4%

24.6%

Poor

1.7%

0.7%

2.4%

5.2%

1.6%

0.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Encourage active learning

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

32.5%

37.6%

28.5%

34.5%

32.7%

27.9%

Good

52.8%

49.9%

55.0%

53.4%

52.6%

54.1%

Fair

13.1%

11.5%

14.4%

12.1%

13.1%

14.8%

Poor

1.6%

1.0%

2.1%

0. 0%

1.6%

3.3%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Encourage student/faculty interaction

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

31.5%

34.7%

29.0%

21.1%

32.6%

26.2%

Good

47.6%

47.8%

47.5%

54.4%

47.2%

47.5%

Fair

17.7%

15.1%

19.8%

19.3%

17.4%

21.3%

Poor

3.1%

2.4%

3.7%

5.3%

2.9%

4.9%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Freq and prompt feedback from faculty

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

27.2%

30.7%

24.5%

24.1%

27.4%

27.9%

Good

57.2%

55.9%

58.2%

62.1%

57.4%

49.2%

Fair

14.8%

12.9%

16.2%

12.1%

14.5%

21.3%

Poor

0.8%

0.5%

1.1%

1.7%

0.7%

1.6%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Time/energy to coursework encouraged

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

40.1%

44.4%

36.8%

41.4%

40.4%

35.0%

Good

50.7%

49.2%

51.9%

46.6%

51.0%

50.0%

Fair

8.9%

6.2%

11.0%

12.1%

8.2%

15.0%

Poor

0.3%

0.2%

0.4%

0.0%

0.4%

0.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Opp for coop learning w/ fellow stdnts

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

39.5%

39.2%

39.7%

39.7%

40.5%

26.2%

Good

44.6%

45.0%

44.3%

51.7%

43.3%

55.7%

Fair

14.2%

14.1%

14.3%

8.6%

14.3%

18.0%

Poor

1.7%

1.7%

1.7%

0.0%

1.9%

0.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Care about academic success/welfare

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

31.6%

35.6%

28.5%

25.9%

32.8%

20.0%

Good

45.2%

42.8%

47.1%

44.8%

45.4%

43.3%

Fair

20.1%

20.2%

20.1%

27.6%

19.3%

25.0%

Poor

3.0%

1.4%

4.3%

1.7%

2.5%

11.7%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Overall rating of faculty

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

29.9%

33.6%

27.1%

27.6%

30.4%

26.2%

Good

60.2%

58.5%

61.5%

62.1%

60.2%

59.0%

Fair

9.4%

7.9%

10.6%

10.3%

9.0%

14.8%

Poor

0.4%

0.0%

0.7%

0.0%

0.5%

0.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top



For more information on the 1999 Graduating Senior Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: April 2000

Download a Microsoft Excel Version (Excel 5.0 or higher) of this report.

Return to 1999 Graduating Senior Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page