[- NC State University -]

1999 Graduating Senior Survey Data Tables:
Frequency Distributions of Responses to Survey Item #13
(Ratings of Non-Academic Services)

 
This document reports the frequency distribution by gender and race/ethnicity of survey item #13 of the 1999 Graduating Senior Survey. A table comparing mean ratings is available on the web.

Exact wording of question: Based on your last two years on this campus, how would you evaluate each of the following services? (If you have not had enough experience with a service to evaluate it, please mark the response "Don't know/did not use" and then skip to the next service.) For those services which required interaction with university offices or units (secretaries, tutors, counselors, office workers, etc.) please rate how responsive the staffs in those offices or units were to your needs.

Services Areas | Staff Responsiveness


Rating of Service Area

Personal safety on campus (service area)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

14.8%

11.3%

17.6%

4.7%

15.5%

16.1%

Good

58.0%

58.9%

57.2%

69.8%

57.0%

58.1%

Fair

21.7%

25.5%

18.7%

23.3%

21.8%

16.1%

Poor

5.6%

4.4%

6.5%

2.3%

5.6%

9.7%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Univ planning & placement services (service area)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

21.5%

24.6%

19.4%

23.8%

21.4%

19.4%

Good

54.9%

52.3%

56.6%

64.3%

54.4%

50.0%

Fair

20.1%

18.1%

21.4%

9.5%

20.7%

25.0%

Poor

3.5%

5.0%

2.6%

2.4%

3.5%

5.6%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

College/dept placement svcs (service area)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

30.9%

32.0%

30.0%

26.8%

31.1%

32.4%

Good

49.7%

49.0%

50.2%

51.2%

50.1%

43.2%

Fair

14.0%

14.1%

14.0%

17.1%

13.5%

16.2%

Poor

5.4%

4.9%

5.8%

4.9%

5.2%

10.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Library services (service area)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

37.0%

36.0%

37.8%

43.1%

36.0%

45.8%

Good

52.8%

53.9%

51.9%

51.7%

53.4%

45.8%

Fair

8.6%

8.3%

8.9%

5.2%

8.9%

8.5%

Poor

1.5%

1.7%

1.4%

0.0%

1.7%

0.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Bookstore services and products (service area)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

15.4%

15.9%

14.9%

16.1%

14.8%

22.8%

Good

53.0%

58.8%

48.4%

57.1%

52.8%

50.9%

Fair

24.0%

20.6%

26.7%

23.2%

24.5%

17.5%

Poor

7.7%

4.7%

10.1%

3.6%

7.9%

8.8%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Registration process (service area)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

32.8%

30.6%

34.6%

41.8%

32.0%

36.2%

Good

50.5%

52.1%

49.3%

43.6%

51.3%

46.6%

Fair

14.7%

15.9%

13.8%

12.7%

14.8%

15.5%

Poor

1.9%

1.5%

2.3%

1.8%

2.0%

1.7%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Financial aid services (service area)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

20.0%

19.1%

20.6%

17.6%

20.1%

21.9%

Good

47.2%

47.3%

47.1%

49.0%

46.3%

56.3%

Fair

20.7%

23.2%

18.9%

25.5%

20.6%

15.6%

Poor

12.1%

10.5%

13.4%

7.8%

13.1%

6.3%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Campus food services (service area)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

7.9%

7.3%

8.3%

8.7%

7.6%

10.0%

Good

37.9%

42.3%

34.7%

45.7%

37.0%

40.0%

Fair

39.5%

38.6%

40.1%

32.6%

40.0%

40.0%

Poor

14.8%

11.8%

16.9%

13.0%

15.3%

10.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Campus health services (service area)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

23.4%

22.3%

24.3%

25.6%

22.6%

32.4%

Good

52.4%

50.2%

54.3%

64.1%

51.3%

56.8%

Fair

19.1%

21.6%

16.9%

10.3%

20.4%

8.1%

Poor

5.2%

5.9%

4.6%

0.0%

5.7%

2.7%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Campus counseling (not career) services (service area)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

23.4%

24.7%

22.5%

32.0%

22.5%

20.8%

Good

49.3%

44.9%

52.5%

48.0%

47.5%

62.5%

Fair

20.1%

20.2%

20.0%

8.0%

23.1%

12.5%

Poor

7.2%

10.1%

5.0%

12.0%

6.9%

4.2%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Business svcs/cashier/stdnt accts (service area)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

15.8%

14.5%

16.9%

13.7%

15.2%

26.8%

Good

56.7%

63.7%

51.7%

43.1%

58.3%

53.7%

Fair

21.9%

17.6%

25.0%

41.2%

20.6%

14.6%

Poor

5.6%

4.3%

6.5%

2.0%

6.0%

4.9%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Residence life programs (service area)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

14.8%

15.3%

14.5%

15.2%

13.7%

25.0%

Good

46.2%

52.0%

42.1%

57.6%

44.5%

50.0%

Fair

29.4%

24.7%

32.7%

24.2%

31.4%

15.6%

Poor

9.6%

8.0%

10.7%

3.0%

10.4%

9.4%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Opportunities for rec activities (service area)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

41.7%

41.8%

41.6%

39.0%

42.0%

40.5%

Good

48.6%

47.0%

49.6%

51.2%

48.5%

45.9%

Fair

7.5%

10.0%

5.8%

9.8%

7.3%

8.1%

Poor

2.2%

1.2%

2.9%

0.0%

2.2%

5.4%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Opportunities for community service (service area)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

22.5%

27.3%

18.5%

10.0%

23.2%

25.9%

Good

47.9%

44.4%

50.8%

56.7%

47.5%

44.4%

Fair

21.6%

19.7%

23.1%

20.0%

21.9%

18.5%

Poor

8.0%

8.6%

7.6%

13.3%

7.4%

11.1%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Opps to dev leadership skills (service area)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

33.6%

36.4%

31.4%

38.6%

33.2%

34.2%

Good

49.2%

49.1%

49.3%

52.3%

48.6%

55.3%

Fair

14.1%

12.0%

15.7%

6.8%

15.1%

7.9%

Poor

3.1%

2.5%

3.6%

2.3%

3.2%

2.6%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top




Rating of Staff Responsiveness

Personal safety on campus (staff responsiveness)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

19.6%

24.3%

16.3%

14.3%

19.9%

23.5%

Good

49.3%

47.9%

50.2%

45.7%

50.3%

35.3%

Fair

22.5%

23.1%

22.2%

31.4%

21.3%

29.4%

Poor

8.6%

4.7%

11.3%

8.6%

8.4%

11.8%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Univ planning & placement services (staff responsiveness)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

26.2%

26.6%

25.9%

27.8%

25.7%

30.4%

Good

50.9%

48.1%

52.7%

58.3%

50.3%

47.8%

Fair

19.1%

20.3%

18.4%

11.1%

19.8%

21.7%

Poor

3.8%

5.1%

2.9%

2.8%

4.1%

0.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

College/dept placement svcs (staff responsiveness)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

32.9%

36.6%

30.4%

28.1%

33.4%

32.0%

Good

46.8%

41.2%

50.7%

50.0%

46.4%

48.0%

Fair

15.8%

17.0%

15.0%

18.8%

15.5%

16.0%

Poor

4.5%

5.2%

4.0%

3.1%

4.6%

4.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Library services (staff responsiveness)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

37.7%

40.9%

35.0%

51.1%

36.6%

38.6%

Good

49.4%

46.2%

52.1%

48.9%

49.1%

54.5%

Fair

10.5%

10.2%

10.8%

0.0%

11.6%

6.8%

Poor

2.4%

2.8%

2.0%

0.0%

2.7%

0.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Bookstore services and products (staff responsiveness)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

15.8%

18.8%

13.4%

15.9%

15.3%

23.3%

Good

51.3%

52.2%

50.5%

54.5%

51.7%

41.9%

Fair

26.7%

25.3%

27.8%

25.0%

26.9%

25.6%

Poor

6.3%

3.8%

8.3%

4.5%

6.2%

9.3%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Registration process (staff responsiveness)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

29.2%

29.8%

28.8%

33.3%

28.7%

30.8%

Good

52.1%

49.8%

53.8%

50.0%

52.3%

51.3%

Fair

17.2%

19.1%

15.9%

16.7%

17.4%

15.4%

Poor

1.5%

1.3%

1.6%

0.0%

1.5%

2.6%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Financial aid services (staff responsiveness)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

20.1%

20.9%

19.5%

17.5%

19.6%

33.3%

Good

41.2%

34.3%

46.6%

45.0%

41.0%

38.1%

Fair

23.7%

29.1%

19.5%

30.0%

23.5%

14.3%

Poor

15.0%

15.7%

14.5%

7.5%

16.0%

14.3%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Campus food services (staff responsiveness)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

11.8%

12.7%

11.1%

13.5%

12.0%

6.9%

Good

37.8%

45.3%

32.6%

54.1%

35.6%

44.8%

Fair

32.6%

28.7%

35.2%

29.7%

32.4%

37.9%

Poor

17.9%

13.3%

21.1%

2.7%

19.9%

10.3%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Campus health services (staff responsiveness)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

32.0%

28.6%

35.2%

41.4%

30.5%

45.2%

Good

44.9%

46.0%

43.8%

58.6%

44.6%

35.5%

Fair

17.3%

21.0%

13.9%

0.0%

18.7%

12.9%

Poor

5.8%

4.4%

7.1%

0.0%

6.2%

6.5%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Campus counsel (not career) svcs (staff responsiveness)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

30.8%

31.0%

30.6%

42.1%

28.9%

31.3%

Good

39.7%

36.6%

42.4%

31.6%

39.7%

50.0%

Fair

20.5%

19.7%

21.2%

10.5%

22.3%

18.8%

Poor

9.0%

12.7%

5.9%

15.8%

9.1%

0.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Business svcs/cashier/stdnt accts (staff responsiveness)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

15.6%

16.7%

14.8%

12.2%

15.0%

28.1%

Good

53.0%

53.4%

52.6%

41.5%

54.6%

46.9%

Fair

23.2%

20.6%

25.2%

43.9%

21.2%

21.9%

Poor

8.2%

9.3%

7.4%

2.4%

9.2%

3.1%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top

Residence life programs (staff responsiveness)

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Excellent

15.3%

16.4%

14.6%

11.1%

15.0%

25.0%

Good

46.7%

54.5%

41.5%

59.3%

45.4%

45.0%

Fair

26.3%

19.1%

31.1%

25.9%

26.9%

0.0%

Poor

11.7%

10.0%

12.8%

3.7%

12.8%

25.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top



For more information on the 1999 Graduating Senior Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted:

Download a Microsoft Excel Version (Excel 5.0 or higher) of this report.

Return to 1999 Graduating Senior Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page